Showing posts with label hard science fiction. Show all posts
Showing posts with label hard science fiction. Show all posts

Thursday, February 6, 2025

2025 read #12: Analog Science Fiction & Fact, January/February 2025 issue.

Analog Science Fiction and Fact, January/February 2025 issue
Edited by Trevor Quachri
208 pages
Published 2024
Read from January 31 to February 6
Rating: 2.5 out of 5

I’ve had subscriptions to both Analog and Asimov’s ever since we moved last spring. I wanted to support both magazines, while keeping abreast of what they’re looking for in fiction these days.

Sadly, I haven’t read any of the issues I’ve gotten. Both magazines are printed by a newsstand puzzle game publisher, making the physical experience of holding and leafing through them especially unpleasant. The ink on my copy’s cover smeared on my hands within minutes of holding it, before I even began reading it. By the time I finished the first story, the spine had begun to peel apart.

The start of a new year of issues seems like a good, round spot to begin, though.


“Our Lady of the Gyre” by Doug Franklin. Despite the passage of decades, and turnover in the editor’s chair, the “house style” of Analog seemingly hasn’t changed all that much since the late 1990s. This piece opens with a traumatic flashback in italics, then throws you in at the deep end with a bunch of in-universe jargon — lilies, observing Eyes, a mysterious Her. Classic Analog.

The ensuing paragraphs are loaded with perhaps a touch more exposition than strictly necessary, over-compensating for the initial opacity. The general gist: our narrator drifts with geoengineering “lilies” around a gyre in the Pacific, harvesting fish while the diatoms in the gyre sink carbon dioxide into the deeps.

There’s a whole bit about “generative AI exacerbated the carbon crisis, but it also gave us the tools to start fixing it,” which feels pulled directly from some tech oligarch’s PR department. I suppose reading the “hard sci-fi” magazine means encountering a rather more, erm, credulous attitude toward Big Tech than I’m used to here in 2025.

Once “Gyre” stops tripping over its own worldbuilding, a perfectly adequate human-scale story emerges, only to end almost as soon as it settles into its groove.


“Strange Events at Fletcher and Front!” by Tom R. Pike. This tale of time travel and solar technology in the nineteen-oughts confirms the Analog “house style” is still going strong. (One story, see, could have been a fluke.) I mean this without a trace of aspersion: this feels like it could have been printed in 1999. I enjoyed it; telling a story of time travel intervention from the perspective of the person whose life was changed, who then spends years trying to figure out why, is an interesting angle.

 —

“Second Chance” by Sakinah Hofler. Brief but compelling examination of race and uploaded consciousness. Excellent.


“Upgrade” by Mark W. Tiedemann. Highly topical yet rather flat story about installing a neural augment in order to stay competitive in an increasingly automated job market. The characters all felt generic, even before anything got installed in their heads.


“Rejuve Blues” by John Shirley. Didn’t care for this one. There’s an interesting kernel in the idea of what rejuvenation would entail for someone turning young again, psychologically and hormonally. But it gets lost in this story. So much expository dialogue, not much to hold my interest, and it felt much too long for what little story there was.


“Fixative” by Jonathan Olfert. Another dense, jargon-forward piece, but this one drops us into a fascinatingly constructed future of corporate drugs and psychological manipulation, where certain hereditary anxiety disorders are harnessed to turn people into walking starship maintenance machines. The best aspects of sci-fi’s New Wave collide with the bleak corporate futurity of the current age. Quite good.


“Notes from Your Descendants” by Lorraine Alden. This flash fic was another blast from the 1990s past, all about designer genetics, as if genetics hold more power over us than how we’re nurtured and what our environment does to us. That’s a pet peeve of mine. If that isn’t an issue for you (and I suspect it was used as a tongue-in-cheek plot device more than anything else), “Descendants” is effective enough. Does what it sets out to do.


“The Only God Is Us” by Sarah Day. It’s telling of what our future has been reduced to that so much contemporary sci-fi is about attempts to salvage our biosphere and ameliorate the carbon crisis. (Thanks, billionaires! May you all have the future you deserve!) This story features bioengineered strains of algae, meant to eat waste and sink carbon dioxide, instead going rogue and dissolving industrial civilization. Excellent entry, affecting and well-written.


“As Ordinary Things Often Do” by Kelly Lagor. I was going to remark that this was only the second story in this issue that involves neither climate catastrophe nor corporate serfdom, but no: a casual line of dialogue makes sure we know Earth is “going to shit.” Oof. Sometimes realism is a curse. This is a human-scale tale of a researcher readying herself for humanity’s first interstellar voyage. Nothing groundbreaking, but it’s sweet and solid.


“Go Your Own Way” by Chris Barnham. A young man learns how to walk the Way between parallel realities, and finds a timeline where he’s happy — until another version of himself comes along.

None of our contemporary problems with futurity here, right? Well, I’d argue that the multiverse became such a staple of 2020s science fiction as an escape from those selfsame issues. It’s that “our timeline took a wrong turn” feeling we all remember from November 2016, and March 2020, and November 2024. And sure enough, in one of the realities Ferdinand visits, the mistakes of internal combustion were pointedly avoided, making for a clean-air utopia with rapid trains. Secretly on-theme after all.

This story held no surprises, and was (to my tastes) excessively heterosexual, ending with two versions of the man arguing over which of them is “better” for their dream girl, rather than giving her a say in her own life. But it was pretty good overall.

I do want to note, for history-of-the-genre enthusiasts, that another world Ferdinand visits is directly lifted from Keith Roberts’ Pavane. Like, almost down to the letter.


A poem: “Beyond the Standard Model” by Ursula Whitcher. It’s quite lovely.


“Prince of Spirals” by Sean McMullen. This one is a boiled-down sci-thriller involving remote archaeology, forensics, and the Boys in the Tower. If you’d shown me this story when I was a 16 year old Michael Crichton fan, I would have loved it. I still think it’s an adequate example of its genre, though one with few surprises up its sleeve. I’m just not into the genre anymore.


“Flight 454” by Virgo Kevonté. Speaking of sci-thriller vibes, this one is a spacecraft-crash mystery set on corporate Ganymede. Not of much interest to me.


“Vigil” by James Van Pelt. A sweetly intimate flash fic about memories on board a generation ship.


“Battle Buddy” by Stephen Raab. Military sci-fi with robots can be a beautiful work of art, as with “Tactical Infantry Bot 37 Dreams of Trochees” by Marie Vibbert, in the January / February 2019 issue F&SF. Or it can be flat and procedural, as with this piece.


“The Spill” by M. T. Reiten. Humorous micro about nanotech gray goo.


“Prime Purpose” by Steve Rasnic Tem. Geriatric care robot assists his declining patient and thinks about purpose, the self, and the loss of both. Well-executed rendition of a recurring plot. Feels very 2000-ish.


“Gut Check” by Robert E. Hampson. Forget the house style of 1990s Analog. We’re going all the way back to the 1960s for this medical emergency in space piece. It is of such vintage that it unironically puts the phrase “steely-eyed missileman” back into print, perhaps the first time in decades. And characterization? Never heard of her. Ends with a Boomer-standard joke.


“Quest of the Sette Comuni” by Paul Di Filippo. Mashing together high fantasy with technobabble, this one sees a neon satyr and her helpful little robot go on a quest in 23rd century Italy. Clunky exposition blunted my enthusiasm for this piece, which is a shame; if I ever get into Analog myself, I could see it being thanks to a story like this. I think it was mildly entertaining overall, in a pulpy kind of way, perhaps because I wanted to like it.


“Apartment Wars” by Vera Brook. A marvelous novella grounded in character, place, and emotion. The science-fictiony topic of quantum topology is blended skillfully with widowed Helena’s precarious position in 1970s Poland, and it’s beautifully written besides. Maybe my favorite story in the issue.


Lastly, a poem: “‘Oumuamua” by Geoffrey A. Landis. Pretty standard rhyming science poetry. Nothing objectionable.


And that’s it! An uneven issue overall, with excellent highlights equal to the best of what 2020s SF has to offer, but an equal amount of what felt to me like filler (but what the old Analog heads probably enjoy). 

Saturday, January 20, 2024

2024 read #11: Asimov’s Science Fiction, July 1999 issue.*

Asimov’s Science Fiction, July 1999 issue (23:7)*
Edited by Gardner Dozois
144 pages
Published 1999
Read from January 19 to January 20
Rating: 3 out of 5

* Denotes a reread.

In the summer of 1999, I aspired to be a science fiction wunderkind.

I had submitted stories as early as 1998. One of my earliest subs had been a tale called “The Dinosaur Man.” It involved a misanthropic physicist building himself a house in the Cretaceous, and one of his old college friends (now a paleontologist) tracking him down after finding a human femur at a Cretaceous dig. I submitted it to Asimov’s, with unsurprising results.

When I saw this issue on the newsstand several months later — with its cover art of a Tyrannosaurus looming behind some partygoers — my first thought was that the editors of Asimov’s had stolen the idea for “The Dinosaur Man” and gotten this Michael Swanwick guy to rewrite it for publication. (What can I say? I was 16 and lived in a car. I had literally zero experience with the outside world.) Reading it proved two things: 1) no one, of course, had stolen my ideas, and 2) I was nowhere near Asimov’s league as a writer.

I read and reread this issue obsessively. Almost every story and poem here left an outsized impression upon my teenage imagination, as only your first issue of a sci-fi magazine can. (I might have read the June 1999 issue of Analog a few weeks before this one, but you get what I mean.) Traces of this issue’s creative DNA filled my notebooks for years. After reading it, I bent over my word processor with renewed energy and invigorated creativity. I wouldn’t get published for another thirteen years, and wouldn’t get published on a professional level until 2022, but at least I succeeded in getting my first positive personal rejection from F&SF later in 1999, which is something.

How has this issue aged?

“Scherzo with Tyrannosaur” by Michael Swanwick. Much (though not all) of this story was recycled into Swanwick’s Bones of the Earth, but I want to take a moment to appreciate it as a standalone tale. It was my first realization that you could combine high quality literary sci-fi with dinosaurs — a formula I’ve been trying to approximate (with minimal success) ever since. It particularly impressed young me because it was my first encounter with an ambiguous ending: the story is left hanging, on the verge of a choice that could go either way. Rereading it now, with the benefit of decades more reading behind me, it’s a standard tangle of time travel, double lives, double timelines, and unexpected paternity. It’s tidy and elegant and written with Swanwick’s signature verve — a solid story, though it didn’t shake the earth like it did when I was 16. But in the mediocre world of dinosaur fiction, that still places “Scherzo” among the best. B

“Another Branch of the Family Tree” by Brian Stableford. This story, in contrast to so many others in this issue, left little impression on my teenage imagination. Rereading it now, I’m not surprised: it’s a forgettable bioengineering number, mixing “bureaucracy, am I right?”-level humor with an attempt at near-future pathos. After a court orders its destruction, geneticist Beth Galton fights to save the tree she genetically grafted in memory of her twin sister. The story isn’t bad, exactly, but it was extremely au courant — 1999 sci-fi in paint-by-numbers format — which makes it feel dated today. It also has that weird tonal mismatch that comes from envisioning a bleak future through the optimism of privilege. You’re telling me water is scarce, most trees are dead, plague wars figure in recent memory, yet somehow “most” people live into their 120s thanks to the power of biotech? Like, please, my guy, develop some class consciousness: maybe that’s what awaits the rich fucks, but the rest of us likely won’t reach the age our parents are now. C-

Content warning for fictional SA in the next story.

“By Non-Hatred Only” by W.M. Shockley. This one insinuated itself deep into my teenage storytelling. “Should this be a ‘By Non-Hatred Only’ type plot?” I noted, rhetorically, on more than one outline. What I imagined that plot to be is lost to time. What’s certain is that my teenage self didn’t understand much of anything about this story. It’s a deeply ’90s spacer revenge tale about Navram, a spiritual counselor with a buried past, serving aboard the starship Koipu Laru. Shockley strains to channel Dune, giving us psychospiritual technologies, sexual spies, cryptic inner monologues, verbal fencing, paranoia about what others might know and what one’s reactions might reveal to them, a cultural abhorrence of sharing one’s “deep-meaning.” It partially works. But it’s also distastefully ’90s in a particularly Asimov’s Science Fiction way: at least a third of the story centers on Navram getting sexually assaulted by one of his clients, which triggers traumatic memories of his planet getting destroyed. I think the ending is meant to be elegant, pulling together all the different threads through Navram’s quiet manipulations, but it comes across as accidentally slapstick. D

“Evolution Never Sleeps” by Elisabeth Malartre. This one joins Stableford’s in the bin of stories that didn’t have much of an impact on me back in 1999. It's a “hard biology” piece about chipmunks turning into pack hunters: “Land piranhas,” in one character’s words. Fun concept for a story! Malartre, unfortunately, seems to have drawn her fiction-writing inspiration from airport thrillers. The characters are interchangeable. The dialogue is stiff with exposition. The whole thing reads like the early chapters of Jurassic Park (which is not a compliment). D+

A Michael Bishop poem, “Secrets of the Alien Reliquary,” may have been my very first exposure to sci-fi poetry. And what a horny first exposure it is! Reading it again, with plenty of queer alien sexuality poetry of my own out there, I think it still holds up.

“Angels of Ashes” by Alastair Reynolds. I can't remember if I originally “got” that the title was a play on Angela’s Ashes, which had been a recent mega-bestseller when this was written. This is another story that fueled my teenage imagination, to the point where a substantial percentage of an early setting was pilfered from it, with only the lightest cosmetic changes. (Don’t worry, I never tried to publish it.) Human priest Sergio is ordained in a religious order that reveres the teachings of the Kiwidinok, alien robots who briefly visited the solar system. Most of the order is android in nature; most liturgical power is in android hands, giving them considerable political power as well. Sergio is summoned to hear the final words of Ivan, the man who, long ago, had been selected to absorb the wisdom of the Kiwidinok. Naturally, there’s more to Ivan’s story than the official creed admits, and the androids aren’t happy with the revelations. The setting is baroque and strange and beautiful, mingling religion with asymmetric physics, terraforming, brain function, supernovas, the anthropic principle, and, of course, quantum superpositioning — a throw-everything-in-the-pot approach that is just so ineffably ’90s. (I mean that positively, for once.) Of the two tales in this issue that center on monastic vows, in the form of bionic implants, complicating the pursuit of political action in space, I prefer this one over “By Non-Hatred Only.” It’s kind of strange that two stories with such specific overlaps were in the same issue, but I suppose that’s how trends work in sci-fi and fantasy. B+

“Interview with an Artist” by Geoffrey A. Landis. For such a slight story with such a well-thumbed premise — time traveler alters the timeline so that Hitler becomes a modestly successful artist, then discovers that “Nasfi” atrocities had been even worse in the resulting future — this one made a big impact on me when I was young. Probably because it was my first time reading anything like it. (An example of how “Artist” influenced me: At 17, I drafted a shock-value comedy titled “Time Cannibals!” based quite loosely around this story’s Hitler vs time travelers vibe. The opening line went: “I ate Adolf Hitler.” Thank goodness I never subbed it anywhere.) Rereading this now, I think it still works fine for what it is. C+

“Baby’s Fire” by Robert Reed. This novella solves a mystery of what the fuck did I read that’s been in the back of my mind for a good two decades. See, long ago, I had read what appeared to be the middle section of a serialized novel: it picked up smack in the middle of the action and ended with a cliffhanger. Had it been in Analog? That sounded right, because it was a sprawling cosmic godhood yarn involving an incomprehensibly privileged stable of humans turning themselves into technologically augmented gods. There was a galactic chase; shapeshifting disguises on various planets; bodies made of arcane math and dark matter; black holes; wormholes; an attempt to birth a new universe. Millions of years transpired. It was vast and rococo in a way I’d never seen before. And here it is! What kept me from finding it earlier was the impression that it was part of a serialized novel. “Baby’s Fire” literally begins mid-word — a pretentious touch that thoroughly impressed my teenage self. Instead, it is part of a cycle dubbed the Sister Alice stories, published sporadically over much of a decade. Now I’m curious to track more of them down, because this entry is delightfully entertaining. And of course, to keep with the theme of this review, I recognize so many elements in this story that I subconsciously pilfered for later worldbuilding, in particular the concept of posthumanist Families with the powers of gods, which found its way into my Timeworlds setting (though that aspect is now, thankfully, backgrounded). “Fire” is crusted with its share of ’90s cultural barnacles — one character talks about how the talent for terraforming lies in the Chamberlain Family’s genes, which really isn’t how genetics works — but still, it earns at least a B+

And that’s it! It was humbling to rediscover the origins of so many of my early settings and projects — purloined, one and all, from the stories here. All writers borrow; creativity is in how you rework what you stole, and I think I’ve grown more skilled at that in the last couple decades. But I had forgotten just how blatant my teenage thefts had been.

Thursday, December 7, 2023

2023 read #150: The Magazine of Fantasy & Science Fiction, November / December 2023 issue.

The Magazine of Fantasy & Science Fiction, November/December 2023 issue (145:5-6)
Edited by Sheree Renée Thomas
258 pages
Published 2023
Read from December 5 to December 7
Rating: 4 out of 5

Even as it becomes ever more difficult to find on newsstands, I’ve kept up with reading each new issue of F&SF while it’s still current, a habit I began with the March/April 2023 issue. I also went back and read the January/February 2023 issue, making 2023 the first year I’ve read every issue of F&SF.

It’s been a terrific year for stories, absolutely unprecedented for quality and breadth of fiction in the magazine, but it’s been an abysmal year for the short genre fiction profession as a whole. Hopefully F&SF (and all the other markets in financial straits) can continue this golden age of creativity and diverse, astonishing fiction. If you love short speculative fiction, support your favorite publications!

How does the final issue of 2023 rate against the others?

“The Many Different Kinds of Love” by Geoff Ryman with David Jeffrey. A vast and magnificent hard science fiction novella, “Love” follows the abiotic viewpoint of a survey station under the surface of Enceladus, as well as the postbiotic encoded memories of five billion people, downloaded and updated to give the AI flexibility and decision-making abilities. And then Earth goes silent, and the updates cease. Like so many excellent stories before it, “Love” explores humanity in all of its petty, beautiful, irrational, violent, tender, selfish, loving, contradictory, bewildering grandeur, constructing a posthumanist vision of fully human (and humane) optimism. Absolutely blew me away.

“Karantha Fish” by Amal Singh. Sharp description and efficient worldbuilding are highlights of this richly atmospheric, space opera-ish tale of religious hangups and misunderstandings. Quite good.

“Longevity” by Anya Ow. In an all-too-near future where teenagers’ bodies are permanently tapped to siphon plasma for the rich, and each human life is worth only what corporations can extract from it, Ruhe is a Forever, her lifespan extended indefinitely so that her Company doesn’t need to train a replacement. Shaken out of the torpor of years by the death of her cat, Ruhe on a whim meets with teenage Kasey, who compares society to the bygone practice of chicken farming: “The useful ones get to stay and grow old forever, laying eggs for the greater cause. The not-so-useful ones get ground out sooner or later.” Chilling, haunting, with a touch of optimism. One of the best near-future pieces I’ve read in some time.

“All That We Leave Behind” by Charlie Hughes. This one feels like a throwback to the 1980s, both in style and in content. A book club finds itself, without quite remembering why, reading a book called All That We Leave Behind. When they meet to discuss it, each of them has been changed — each of them has prepared, whether they remember it clearly or not. Not my genre, but this story succeeds at what it’s trying to do.

The first in a block of poems, Lisa M. Bradley’s “Through the Keyhole” is a werewolf tale full of gristle and beauty. Wonderful stuff.

Next, a pleasant surprise: Geoffrey A. Landis’ “No One Now Remembers—” is a lovely poem about dinosaurs. Perhaps it’s a stretch to add the dinosaur fiction tag to this issue, but hell, this poem deserves it.

Landis also contributes a poem about “Titan.” It’s fine enough, but lacks dinosaurs.

Marissa Lingen’s “Like Other Girls” is the last poem in this block. It is a powerful reinterpretation of Andersen’s “The Little Mermaid.”

“Portrait of a Dragon as a Young Man” by J.A. Pak. A sweet, wistful recollection of a dragon’s first love, and his first experience of learning to be human. Features a comfortable, lived-in world, and crisp prose. Excellent.

A couple on-theme poems by Mary Soon Lee follow: “Orchid Dragon” and “Phoenix Dragon.” Both are exquisite.

“Twelve Aspects of the Dragon” by Rachel K. Jones. Sumptuous sensory list that also tells a story. Creative and evocative, unexpectedly sexy.

“Meeting in Greenwood” by R. K. Duncan. Yet another all-time classic in an issue freighted with them. Timothy Jackson is a fed who rides the trains of the dead to make contact with spirits who help fight against the Lost Cause of slavery. “Greenwood” is a staggering feat of imagination and a resounding fuck-you to the white supremacist machinations that have led from Appomattox to our present moment.

“The Pigeon Wife” by Samantha H. Chung. Another stunner, flawlessly mixing folklore and the struggles of modern Late Capitalism. Our narrator snags a pigeon husband to stabilize her finances — but then he unionizes.

“Los Pajaritos” by Sam W. Pisciotta. Sharp and efficient examination of loss — personal and ecological — after the disappearance of sparrows. Heartbreaking and gorgeous.

Chet Weise gives us “Science Fiction Novel in Four to Seven Words,” a poem which takes Hemingway’s famous six word story and adds “A.I.” and a line break.

“Pluto and Tavis D Work the Door” by Brooke Brannon. A strange and atmospheric tale of appropriation and cultural parasitism, and learning how to communicate your feelings.

Two poems by Brian U. Garrison follow: “The Music of Neptune” and “Lesser Realities.”

“Indigena” by Jennifer Maloney. Brief but vivid depiction of how an alien ecology might deal with an invasive species: humanity. Solid.

A poem by Roger Dutcher, “The Canceled Sky,” has some good imagery.

“New Stars” by Christopher Crew. Another story that feels like an ’80s (or perhaps ’70s) throwback, a fairly straightforward tale of a father and son watching a spaceship race burn past their planet, rooting for the ship piloted by the memory patterns of the boy’s grandfather. Enjoyable.

“High Tide at Olduvai Gorge” by Kedrick Brown. After Earth was conquered and colonized by the humans from Elucida, a people who promise equality but instead value financial “respectability” above all else, former Olympic athlete Ayo happens to win the lottery, finally gaining the “respectability” needed to compete again. But even then, the playing field is far from level. A sardonic, trenchant allegory.

“Prisoner 121 Is Guilty” by Renee Pillai. A tragic tale of life and punishment under a deeply hierarchical culture. I think it’s a bit too compressed for the story to fully bloom; some extra space for character and worldbuilding would be nice.

“Fools and Their Money” by Meighan Hogate. Pheena is a venal bird who likes coin, and doesn’t mind whether he gets it for his services as a guide or by guiding his charges into a bog to get killed by a swarm. One such traveler happens to bring a cursed amulet his way. It more or less amounts to a chaotic evil rogue’s backstory, but it’s told creatively. Enjoyable.

We wrap up this issue with a poem from Marisca Pichette: “triple knot.” It is, as expected, utterly enrapturing.

And that’s it! A stunning issue, among the very best I’ve ever read. May Sheree Renée Thomas’ time as editor continue long, and brilliantly!

Saturday, November 4, 2023

2023 read #129: Asimov’s Science Fiction, February 2000 issue.

Asimov’s Science Fiction, February 2000 issue (24:2)
Edited by Gardner Dozois
144 pages
Published 2000
Read from November 3 to November 4
Rating: 2 out of 5

As with the March 2000 issue of Fantasy & Science Fiction, I read a fragment of this issue when it was on newsstands at my local Barnes & Noble. I was 17 and had a handful of story rejections to my name. Some had been rough; at least one had been sorta encouraging. Of the stories, about 75% had been about dinosaurs. I wanted to regroup: read what was getting published, see what professional short fiction looked like, improve my craft. Basically, scope out the competition and take notes.

This issue just happened to have a dinosaur story in it, so that was the story I read. All these years later, that dino story is the reason I tracked down a copy of this issue to read in full today.

“The Royals of Hegn” by Ursula K. Le Guin. It’s funny that at 17 I bypassed a Le Guin story to get to a dino fic, but as a teen I was rarely allowed to read anything more recent than the Edwardian era; I don’t believe I even recognized her name at the time. I wouldn’t read any of her books until I picked up The Left Hand of Darkness around ’07. If “Hegn” had been my first exposure to Le Guin, it’s possible my teenage self would not have been impressed. It’s a droll, satirical affair set in an island kingdom where the population is so small, and so interrelated, that almost everyone is an aristocrat or king in some way. All of these royals are obsessed with the doings of the single family of inbred commoners. (Keep in mind, for context, Princess Diana’s televised funeral would have been less than two years before this was penned.) Even an indifferent Le Guin will be worthwhile, and I always appreciate a middle finger to the institutions of power, but this was not her best effort. Maybe C+

A poem follows: “The Latest Literary Device” by Timons Esaias. It worked well enough, though it housed a better poem in its heart, blunted by its ironic “device.”

“How Josiah Taylor Lost His Soul” by L. Timmel Duchamp. One of my pet peeves as a reader and writer of SFFH is when mainstream literary authors swoop in, write a book rooted in a vintage SFFH premise, and get lauded for their originality. Don’t get me wrong — I loved Never Let Me Go. But here it is in miniature, five full years before Kazuo Ishiguro released it to acclaim, awards nominations, and movie deals. Josiah Taylor is a hardline Christian CEO who’s making the leap to a senate seat. He has at his disposal a small army of clones for whenever he needs, or wants, to replace a body part. Conveniently for Taylor’s theology, clones are considered “soulless” second-order creations. Our viewpoint is a clone designated Ezekiel, who strains to overcome his loyalty modifications to aid a plot to murder and replace Josiah. Okay, so it isn’t the same story as Never Let Me Go. This is less about the fragility and fleeting beauties of a life lived as spare parts for someone else, and more about dosed hormones, bloodlust, and inconvenient erections. No one would ever say it’s on the same stratum as Never Let Me Go. But it’s a solid enough take on an already thoroughly explored trope. C

A poem: “Technoghosts” by Ruth Berman. Can you imagine a more turn-of-the-millennium title? It’s a comedic little number about vengeful ghosts updating how they get in touch with you.

CW for the next story for sexualization of a child.

“Downriver” by James Sarafin. After a confrontation between Alaska Natives and the federal government leaves Anchorage (and 40% of Alaska’s population) destroyed, Ed, a hunting lodge proprietor, keeps his clients captive as menial labor, helping him survive out in the bush while martial law and secession movements cut them off from the outside world. What had been a mildly interesting premise collapses in a wave of ’80s-style grodiness when a derelict boat drifts by their camp, its only survivor an adolescent girl. You can guess how the rest goes. This story is competently written, but has no reason to exist other than a wish to be edgy. Maybe, generously, F+

“The Shunned Trailer” by Esther M. Friesner. Humorous and horny Lovecraft pastiche, written in a tongue-in-cheek antique style. Our hero, a fratty Harvard bro on spring break, wants to get drunk and get laid. After some hitchhiking misadventures, he winds up sheltering from a storm in a trailer park full of mutant hillbillies who worship the Elder Gods. It wasn’t terrible, but “Trailer” quickly wore out all two of its jokes and overstayed its welcome. It’s weird, though, how there have been two stories in this issue about trashy inbred freaks. C-

“Tyrannous and Strong” by O’Neil De Noux. Here at age 40, with well over ten years of deliberately wide-ranging reading behind me, it’s quaint to remember how impressionable I was in my teens. Every short story I read back then (and there were so few of them) inspired three or four copycat ideas. I only read this story once, standing there in the Barnes & Noble, but in my notebooks from that time, you’ll find several references: “set this on a ‘Tyrannous & Strong’ type world” and so forth. I also went through a brief fad for widowed main characters. Even our narrator MacIntyre’s talking household computer found its way into one of my earliest Timeworld stories. I’m aware now that De Noux’s world of Octavion — an alien planet with magenta trees, turquoise waters, remote livestock stations, and creatures that happen to be identical to dinosaurs — is a midcentury sci-fi trope, entertaining enough but not nearly as original as my teen self believed. I did enjoy the world De Noux built, though it’s really just dinos, a ranch, hot sun, and some trees of unusual color. The story is slight, little more than a would-be Hemingway’s “a man’s gotta kill the beast to protect what’s his” affair. The titular tyrannosaur is, in all essentials, the one from Jurassic Park. If this were about anything other than dinosaurs, “Tyrannous” would be a big shrug, little more than an extended action sequence. But it’s hard to find decent dino fiction, and of all the stories I’ve tracked down in magazines from this era, this one has aged the most gracefully. So I’ll give it a little boost in the ratings, as a treat. B-

“The Forest Between the Worlds” by G. David Nordley. Early on in this blog, I used to make more of a distinction between hard and soft science fiction, but I let that lapse as I read more sci-fi that couldn’t be cleanly sorted into either category. However, when a story comes with fuckin’ diagrams, I’ll go ahead and file it under hard sci-fi. I mean, look at this:


Ridiculous. Like, we get it, you Did The Math for your story. Goddamn.

Still, the setting is the most interesting aspect of this sprawling novella. Haze and Shadow are a double world, tidally locked, bridged by the titular column of forest, grappling them together in an unlikely but stable configuration. One is reminded of Pluto and Charon in Catherynne M. Valente’s Radiance. It’s a compelling science fictional concept from an era of compelling space opera worlds. It’s richly detailed and is a worthy addition to the Big Stuff in Space tradition.

The characters and outline of the story are less compelling. Sharada is a human anthropologist who’s been getting a bit too personal with the spiderlike Forest People — “going native,” in the colonial phrase. She fucks them because of course she postulates that they communicate information through fluid exchange. And because Haze and Shadow are hothouse worlds, she and all the other human scientists are naked most of the time. Akil, our viewpoint character, is sent up the Forest with fellow researcher Marianne to find Sharada and bring her back to base for a disciplinary hearing. But the spidery Forest People might be more interested in the humans than it seems.

And, of course, because it’s a dude writing sci-fi, I have to CW again for sexualization of a child.

Turns out Sharada has brought the 12 year old daughter of one of the higher-ups into the Forest — the Forest with the fuck-to-communicate aliens. Fucking ugh. I didn’t need to read that. There’s also some genes-are-destiny bullshit about how, before humans genetically modified themselves, women were just naturally more emotional and worse at math. Marianne’s sapphic nature is pointedly called “not an ancient human tradition,” and to get comfort from Akil, she switches to straight like it’s nothing.

Fucking ugh. None of that bullshit was necessary in the space forest novella, my dude. None of it. Violating a 12 year old character added precisely nothing to the story beyond shock value. “Women are so biologically bad at math we had to genetically modify our species” is spectacularly absurd. Pretending lesbianism is some newfangled kink is on that same level.

This story is a wildly mixed bag. Worldbuilding is a solid A. Story is an adequate C or C+. Extraneous “gender is genes” bullshit and child assault? Big old F. Eff eff eff. Maybe I’ll average it out to something around D-

Or hell, I’ll just go with F

Well, that was a wild ride. Good lord. At least the dino story was okay??

I was planning on a paragraph or two about my teenage writing journey and what I wish had gone differently, but I don't want my personal baggage associated with this issue anymore.

Tuesday, September 26, 2023

2023 read #105: The Magazine of Fantasy & Science Fiction, September/October 2023.

The Magazine of Fantasy & Science Fiction, September / October 2023 issue (145:3-4)
Edited by Sheree Renée Thomas
258 pages
Published 2023
Read from September 25 to September 26
Rating: 3.5 out of 5

As I hinted at in my review of the January / February 2023 issue, I’m continuing to stay current with new issues of F&SF as a gesture of support for Sheree Renée Thomas, the finest editor in the magazine’s nearly 75 year history. I may be deeply skeptical of the institutional structure of the magazine now, but Thomas is putting together an unparalleled run at the editorial helm, and needs more readers behind her.

“Shining Shores” by Max Firehammer. Slow-burn eldritch horror in a coastal resort town. It’s a promising story, full of creepy imagery: colossal sea gods, gouged eyes, joints popping out of socket, a shotgun battle in the back of a cop car. You know, the classics. It escalates into one of the goriest pieces I’ve ever read in F&SF. To my personal taste, while the bones of the story are quite good, “Shores” has too much of the developing author tendency to transcribe every action of the narrator’s progress instead of trusting the reader to fill in the blanks. (Sample: “I had the name of Paul’s hotel punched into my phone, and before long, I was there.”) It’s something I struggle with in my own writing, but still, I found it harder to slip into the rhythm of the story as a result.

“Bayanihan” by Maricar Macario. Atmospheric and absorbing tale of culture, immigration, and family bonds across two worlds. It is heavy with the loss of language, the loss of place, the dislocations inflicted by colonialism and its influence. Our second-person narrator’s childhood in what little global warming has left of the Philippines leads to an alienating teenhood on cosmopolitan Mars, where a galaxy of beings intermingle with humans — but the rich and privileged, alas, are still the ones in charge of everything; the world with money culturally colonizes the world that lacks it. Great story, vulnerable and moving. One of the best Mars colony stories I’ve ever read.

“Sort Code” by Chris Barnham. I’m tired of men who slip “bitch” into their stories — and damn, they just love finding ways to jimmy it in. This one checks it off the basic male lit to-do list on the first page. (What is this, 1990?) It predisposed me against this story right from the get-go. “Code” is competent enough, a standard tale of dying and finding oneself unstuck in time with a manic pixie dream girl, but it didn’t rouse sufficient interest to overcome the odor of Dude Writing 101. Any story along these lines is going to have to distinguish itself against Kim Stanley Robinson’s “A Short, Sharp Shock” (reviewed here), so it had an uphill battle even without that “bitch.”

“What We Found in the Forest” by Phoebe Wood. This one is gorgeous, a spore-clouded journey of self-discovery and love that feels much vaster and more immersive than its mere three pages would suggest. Outstanding!

“Three Sisters Syzygy” by Christopher Mark Rose. Ordinarily, I appreciate a good thematic through-line in a magazine issue. However, presenting another “I’m in a different timeline and I don’t quite know who these people are or what I’m doing here” story so quickly after “Sort Code” was a touch monotonous, at first. This tale of reality-hopping astronauts finding themselves among the sisters they had always wanted, the three of them exploring Earth’s three moons during their rare alignment, is far superior to “Code.” In fact, it’s quite good: technicolor, strange, moving, thematically interesting. It’s threaded with old pulp imagery — rocketships! moon banquets! robots! space pirates! Plus, syzygy was one of my favorite words growing up, so I’m pleased to find it in a title. As far as the “what universe am I in?” repetition goes, I suppose it’s understandable. We’ve all felt dislocated to an alternate universe since early 2020; multiversal stories touch a deep, collective trauma in our lives, and they’ll keep popping up until our culture finds new ways to approach and process that trauma.

“Mixtapes from Neptune” by Karter Mycroft. Another brief but evocative piece that feels more substantial than its length would suggest. Hard science fiction that feels as sentimental and dreamy as the best fantasy.

“To Pluck a Twisted String” by Anne Leonard. Another solid though short piece, a sharp-edged domestic fantasy of parenthood, loss, and the pressures of the world.

“My Embroidery Stitches Are Me” by A Humphrey Lanham. A lyrical flash fabulist piece that examines generational trauma, abuse, and learning to separate ourselves from what our parents have pressed upon us. Heartbreaking and beautiful, a three-page story that left me weeping. F&SF has truly come into its own as a market for transcendent flash fic.

“Upstairs” by Tessa Yang. This is an excellent piece that thrums with the tension and tragedy of our stratified future. Our narrator Sadie has “won” the housing lottery — i.e., her wife Eileen was recruited by Recyclon, a vast capitalist conglomerate, so their family just happened to get selected to move into the climate-controlled habitats of Upper Michy, towering above the concrete and pollution of old Lower Michy. Yang draws domestic details with an emotional precision that heightens the uneasiness, winding us into Sadie’s misgivings, her suspicions that the elevated world will get pulled out from under her family, her need to whatever it takes — even selling out — to keep them all up there. Small spoilers: The “organized criminals smuggling meat into a vegan dystopia” plot feels like it should be silly, a throwback to the “EPA is out to get us!” libertarian strain of late ’80s sci-fi, yet the emotional groundwork is established with such care that it all has real stakes. (Pun only partially intended.) 1980s dystopian writers could never put together anything this nuanced.

“Teatro Anatomico” by Getty Hesse. This is half of an excellent story. Hesse presents this macabre mood piece in a somewhat archaic cadence, most reminiscent of 1920s modernists approximating a florid Victorian style. It works well with its scene, an Early Modern anatomical theater exhibiting a dissection during Carnival, when the dead don’t truly die. I’m a sucker for fantasy with an Early Modern setting. This tale was doing so well up until some male-gaze pseudo-incestuous BDSM creeps into the narrative. It feels like it would be right at home in a 1990 issue of Asimov’s Science Fiction. Oh well.

“Night Haul” by Andrew Crowley. This one, meanwhile, feels like it could have come from a 1989 issue of F&SF. (Or else maybe a tossed-off tale from Stephen King's cocaine days.) It’s the voyage of the Demeter but make it a big rig, complete with CB radio. It's moderately entertaining.

“On the Matter of Homo sapiens” by Kel Coleman. A wonderfully sweet little tale about two robot friends who go geocaching together. An unexpected tearjerker.

“Sugar Steak” by Jenny Kiefer. Absolutely revolting (but ghoulishly entertaining) piece of dental horror. The strength of this story is in the specificity of the descriptions. Made me dry-heave a few times, in a fun way!

“Growths” by Nina Kiriki Hoffman. A sharply described story of growing up different, learning that you can't always rely on your parents, and refusing to make things easier for yourself by giving in and blending with everyone else.

Two poems by Alexandra Elizabeth Honigsberg: “Expedition” and “Shapeshifter.” Of the two, I like the latter best.

“If I Should Fall Behind” by Douglas Smith. Some spoilers: Tumble has the power to jump between branching multiverses of possibility; Piph has been tagging along with him, on the run for six years, ever since he saved her from a boat accident at the summer-camp they shared as foster kids. They're being chased because, unbeknownst to either of them, Tumble's probability jumps are destabilizing the multiverse. This story feels like an artifact of late '60s or early '70s sci-fi, not quite New Wave but clearly inspired by it, moving in an artsier direction with its prose but still telling stories of steely supermen (and the babes who love them) eluding enemy toughs in something approximating the modern day. Not a bad story, but it isn't my favorite thing, either, particularly once Piph's life becomes a plot device. 

We close out this issue with “Crossing the Universe,” a poem by Vanessa Taal. Some nice imagery.

This issue was more of a mixed bag than most from the Thomas era. Several amazing stories, some all-time favorites, but also quite a few tales that felt stale, dated, like leftovers from another time.

Sunday, May 14, 2023

2023 read #52: The Magazine of Fantasy & Science Fiction, May/June 2016.

The Magazine of Fantasy & Science Fiction, May/June 2016 issue (130:5-6)
Edited by C. C. Finlay
258 pages
Published 2016
Read from May 12 to May 14
Rating: 2.5 out of 5

After I read the March 2000 issue of F&SF (an issue I leafed through but didn’t buy from the bookstore as a teen), I simply had to find out when I actually bought my first current F&SF from the newsstand.

I’ve gotten many used copies from the relevant time frame from places like Half Price Books, which confused the issue, no pun intended. However, I believe this one is it. I distinctly remember how the combination of pulpy barbarian-diving-at-rock-creature cover art and the inclusion of a Ted Chiang story sold me on it. I never got around to reading this issue until now, though, despite carting it with me through five moves, the rise of American fascism, an ongoing pandemic, and a few life-altering personal crises.

Ah, to reminisce about the early days of 2016, before everything — and I mean everything — went wrong…

“More Heat than Light” by Charlotte Ashley. The editorial description of this novelette was an instant yes from me: “[A] new adventure set in a parallel world where the French Revolution comes to Quebec and revolutionaries take up arms against the English in the monster-ridden wilderness.” The tale itself proved to be a solid pseudo-historical military fantasy, with fewer monsters and less wilderness than could be desired, but it’s a narrative that explores an interesting intersection of prejudice and power: the ideal of the universal people’s republic against the reality of entrenched social hierarchies of gender, class, and race, and how much struggle it takes to dismantle those hierarchies. B

“Last of the Sharkspeakers” by Brian Trent. This novelette reads like a late 1980s piece, throwing you in at the deep end of its elaborate far-future worldbuilding. It's full of hollowed asteroid cities, scrappy tribal mutants, scheduled rainstorms, flying cargo sharks, and silly future lingo like truespeech and brainsmall. The Tower People use painwands to punish and assert control over our low-grav adapted “beltbugs,” then recruit them for their war against the icari, a branch of humanity who dare to claim Earth even though they have adapted and evolved from all their generations in deep space. Yet, despite living so deep in the future that humans have diverged into different adaptations for space life, the Tower People have names like Carol and Frank and watch news broadcasts and soap operas. “Sharkspeakers” isn't bad per se — in fact I appreciated the way it played with the religious refusal to adapt and evolve, the insular sense of superiority it confers, and the disgust and dehumanization that such people direct at the rest of us out here just living our lives — but the story is a bit of a mess. The climax and coda are especially awkward, shoehorning us into the banal military sci-fi of Trent’s broader “War Hero” universe. The whole story likely could have done more with half the length. I’ll be generous: C-

“The Nostalgia Calculator” by Rich Larson. That title is pure 2010s sci-fi, in a good way. This story, however, is pure 2010s sci-fi, in a derogatory sense. It has a smarmy, privileged, “nothing really matters because our POV is an extremely white nepo baby” vibe. It feels like the linear descendant of turn-of-the-millennium netizen cyberpunk, but gone full sleazy and cynical with age, full of tech-bro asides like the hand-job app developed by a former Ivy League classmate (“Wendee [the liberal scold girlfriend currently on a tech cleanse in Tibet] would never have to know”). The underlying conceit, that a big tech firm tracks and manipulates cycles of nostalgia, which have gone from decades in length to months, reminds me of kids-on-my-lawn memes that circulated on Facebook around this time. The story’s optimism that simply leaking the truth about corporate skullduggery would change anything is a heartbreaking relic of a naive, pre-Panama Papers, pre-Trump Cult world. I’m not the right audience for this one, and that’s okay. I did find some faint amusement in it here and there. D+

“Coyote Song” by Pat MacEwen. Yet another long-form story, a novella this time. This issue seems particularly loaded with long-forms: a novella, five novelettes, and only five short stories. Three of the first four stories are long-form. It makes the issue feel unbalanced. This one (for about half its length) is a contemporary crime scene procedural, which excites exactly zero interest. I suppose it delivers on what it sets out to do; the first half felt exactly like watching an investigation procedural show, one with a writing room both more talented and more skeptical of cops than usual, with hour long episodes and an emphasis on dark magic cases. But because I don’t care about any of that (aside from maybe the dark magic), that first half was a slog for me. Even when the story shifted gears halfway through, and became more definitively magical, I was too soured by everything that had gone before. C-

“The Great Silence” by Allora & Calzadilla and Ted Chiang. This has to be one of the more esoteric ways I’ve seen a story wind up in F&SF: This is technically a reprint of a story that was displayed on a screen as part of a video art installation by Jennifer Allora and Guillermo Calzadilla. It’s a spare yet haunting piece on the colonial ecocide of Earth, drawing a parallel between humanity’s search for intelligent life at Arecibo with industrial humanity’s disregard for the other intelligent species able to communicate with us right here on Earth. It’s just a wisp of a story, more essay than story really, yet it conveys a delicate heartbreak that shatters to the core. A

“Caribou: Documentary Fragments” by Joseph Tomaras. I think sci-fi, like all genres of writing, should feel free to draw from the worst of human behavior; we need to make uncomfortable art, even painful art, art that screams against our cultural complacency. I can’t tell if “Caribou” is good art, though. It is unpleasant near-future sci-fi drawn from the cultural rot and horrors of our military occupations in Central and Southwest Asia. The story itself is framed as a transcript of a documentary on bioengineered memory modification and the always-evil machinations of DARPA. It’s a sterile (sometimes literally redacted) presentation of sexual torture and obscene crimes as a matter of national policy. On the sci-fi end of things, it draws a metaphor between the normalization of fascist values during recent decades and the (literal) viral propagation of trauma, which is conceptually apt. I recognize that some ambition went into telling this story in this way, and it’s necessary to examine and contextualize the horrors of our colonialism, but something about the disconnect between subject and format here was especially alienating (likely on purpose). I did, however, appreciate the line, “Once Americans knew, for the most part, they didn’t care.” If that doesn’t describe the 21st century so far… C

It’s a good reminder to my personal nostalgia that all was not hunky-dory in the first half of 2016. The roots of modern American fascism run deep.

“Steamboat Gothic” by Albert E. Cowdrey. This novelette could have been an enjoyable yarn about a locked room mystery, a devilish intruder, and a Victorian Gothic mansion. The writing is zippy and assured. However, its central character is an openly corrupt Louisiana sheriff, who has his palms greased via financial interests in every business venture in the parish, and at one point “rents” the labor of a prisoner from a work-release program. In other words, a tame and sanitized version of what actually happens in Louisiana. Nothing wrong with having a detestable protagonist, of course, but a protagonist who's a cop? Now that’s a bridge too far. Plus it all ends in a Boomer-y punchline about rap music. C-

“Ash” by Susan Palwick. A sweetly domestic fabulist piece examining memories, mementos, and the temptations of not letting go. It's directly inspired by the contemporaneous tiny house and minimalism movements, which of course I could critique as bourgeois affectations, ways to colonize even poverty. But this story is too earnest for all that, too tender. B

“The Secret Mirror of Moriyama House” by Yukimi Ogawa. Another gorgeously sweet and sad domestic fantasy, this one about an old woman who knits patch jobs to close the wounds of the dead and make them more presentable, and the quietly grieving young woman who becomes her assistant. B

“The Long Fall Up” by William Ledbetter. The first of two novelettes that close out this issue. This one is a hard sci-fi “realistic spaceships” piece centered on an operative launched from Jīnshān Station (at Lagrange point five) to intercept, and terminate, Veronica Perez, a woman who illegally impregnated herself in space  with the intent of gestating a child fully in zero-G. Given the author’s ethnicity, and the modern-day geopolitics of the American/Chinese economic rivalry, this makes me uncomfortable — cultural Sinophobia permeates just about everything in how this one was set up. Like, did the “kill the pregnant woman in space while we lie to the world about our intentions in order to protect our space monopoly” corporate baddies have to be Chinese, William? Plenty of American businessmen would be likelier candidates for that role. Maybe you went in this direction because of your career in the American aerospace sector, William. All that, plus my general discomfort with a cis-man writing a story centered on a woman’s reproductive autonomy, and the man who rides in to save the day, made me unhappy with this one. It’s a solid story, but laden with baggage. D+

“The Stone War” by Ted Kosmatka. The final story, and the cover story at last! It's pure ’70s sword and sorcery, though better written (and more meaningful) than almost anything in that category. The story is vast, spanning from the Paleolithic to the age of kings; the vibes are immaculate, trippy, mythical, soaked with blood and quiet pathos. Under its swords and sinews, “The Stone War” offers a critique of the destructive cycles of violent performances of masculinity and their use as a tool of patriarchal power; society flourishes in their absence. B

And that’s it! It only took seven years, but I’ve finally read the very first F&SF I bought new from the newsstand. Only 53 more issues before I’ve read every F&SF in my collection!

Thursday, February 7, 2019

2019 read #4: The Magazine of Fantasy & Science Fiction, January/February 2019.

The Magazine of Fantasy & Science Fiction, January/February 2019 issue (136:1-2)
Edited by C. C. Finlay
258 pages
Published 2018
Read from January 16 to February 7
Rating: 2.5 out of 5

I'm trying something different here: reviewing an issue of a fiction magazine as if it were a book. I've been collecting speculative fiction magazines for a number of years, all the while intending to read and review their contents here, but through the magic of procrastination and inertia, I just haven't managed to do so before now.

So what prompted me to sit down and start reading my collection? In the last few months I've written a handful of short stories and sent them like beautiful ducklings out into the world, accumulating rejection after rejection from the likes of Asimov'sClarkesworld, and this very magazine I'm reading today. Getting a story accepted by and published in Fantasy & Science Fiction has been one of my life's goals ever since 1999, when I got a personalized rejection letter from then-editor Gordon Van Gelder for a meandering and not especially interesting novella about a contract architect building a house in the Late Cretaceous. "The time for this sort of thing is past, alas," he wrote, and my teenage ego clung to that "alas." I'd leap to publish this if dinosaur stories still sold magazines like in '93 is how I chose to read that "alas."

Over the intervening years, that imaginary bandaid for a fragile ego has evolved into a genuine appreciation for F&SF as a publication. Its two "Very Best of" anthologies (12) are perhaps my favorite SF short fiction collections; the tales I like best from various yearly anthologies often turn out to be sourced from F&SF. The aesthetic of its fiction—small moments, delicate beauty, character-based storytelling, often a quiet note of melancholy—is what I aspire to in my own work. Getting so many stories rejected by F&SF in such a short period of time these last few months, while not all that surprising, has been a disappointment. I had been so certain that my stories had become worthy of the magazine I loved.

But I hadn't exactly read an issue of the magazine, had I? Anthologies, best-ofs, collections, sure—but no current issues, nothing cover-to-cover fresh off the newsstand. I'm hoping to change that now—and just maybe get a better sense of the storytelling currently sought by F&SF's current editor. It's been quite some time since I read any short SF whatsoever, so reading more stories can only help my craft, regardless.

"To the Beautiful Shining Twilight" by Carrie Vaughn. All in all, I liked this story. The opening hook compacts a wealth of setting and character detail into a brief couple of paragraphs and immediately sets the mood and feel of the entire piece. Once past that opening, however, I felt that the remainder of the story—while charming—was more workmanlike than innovative. The tale of Abby and her former bandmates receiving a visit from a Knight of Faerie, thirty years after they came to the aid of the Queen of Faerie with their music, could have been a product of the 1980s urban fantasy boom; it could easily have been a direct sequel to War for the Oaks. Airen the fae knight was a cardboard standee of an equally dated genre cliche. The theme of "what happens after the adventure" is a rather more modern preoccupation, as exemplified by Among Others and Every Heart a Doorway, but had you told me this story had been published in 1988, I wouldn't have guessed otherwise. I'm a fan of 1980s faerie fantasy, so the lack of originality didn't diminish my enjoyment, but I was a little surprised to find it here.

"The Province of Saints" by Robert Reed. This one, by contrast, seems straight out of 1998. In the near future, a new prescription drug floods the human mind with empathy—which here is framed as the human animal's best tool to manipulate others. A shocking mass death unfolds on the estate of a family of wealthy rural sociopaths. The ensuing mystery investigation Makes a Statement and Makes You Think about the human condition. I think I would have been blown away by this story around the time that I received that personal rejection letter from Gordon Van Gelder. But now, having seen more of the world, I'm far from convinced of the central conceit that empathy is just another way for humans to be selfish; without buying into that idea, the rest of the story falls apart. I'm not a fan of mysteries and murders, so that works against the story as well, at least for me. Robert Reed is an excellent craftsman of short stories, but that's almost a drawback for this particular tale—it feels, well, crafted. The artifice shows.

"Joe Diablo's Farewell" by Andy Duncan. I'm not sure how I feel about this piece, a historical slice-of-life set in 1920s Manhattan served with a garnish of ghost story. The prose quality was only average, and while I appreciated (in principle) the scene where men drawn from the various under-privileged ethnic and racial groups of interwar New York City, dressed like movie Indians for a Broadway premiere, ate chickpeas and talked about how their cultures used chickpeas, it didn't really say anything new. Overall the story felt incomplete, or perhaps pressed and shaped together from scraps of several stories (or fragments of a larger one).

"The City of Lost Desire" by Phyllis Eisenstein. I've loved the stories of Alaric the minstrel since I first encountered him like a sweet, sensitive flower while slogging through the grim mire of Lin Carter's Year's Best Fantasy. In that review I wrote, "This story showed me I've long held an unconscious desire to see high fantasy written for the aesthetic standards of F&SF." Further, reading those Lin Carter compilations, awful as they were, helped cultivate a taste for the style, mood, and rhythms of 1970s-style fantasy serials. This story ably satisfied on both counts. It's comforting to slip into a lived-in setting like Alaric's world, full of references to other adventures that may or may not have made it to print, none of which are required to understand the story at hand but make everything feel larger than one mere novella. It packs in all the rewards of an extensive epic fantasy series with none of the time investment. I enjoyed this entry quite a lot, though I will say that none of the characters aside from Alaric felt developed in any way, and the story itself went on maybe a smidgeon too long.

"The Right Number of Cats" by Jenn Reese. A tame cosmic horror microfic about learning to accept grief. Pretty good.

"Survey" by Adam-Troy Castro. My best guess about this one is that it's a third-rate retread of Ursula K. Le Guin's classic "Those Who Walk Away from Omelas," leaning hard into the shock value but offering little new to say regarding each individual's complicity in the horrors of capitalism. If the moral of the story was not "We're all complicit in the horrors of capitalism," then I'm even more lost. Did not care for this one.

"Blue as Blood" by Leah Cypress. This novelette is my favorite story in the issue so far, but it's hard to put into words why. It's an excellent example of science fiction as an avenue to explore social ideas, to examine prejudice and in-vs.-outgroup behavior from a fictional but relatable angle. "Inscrutable insectoid aliens inspire human prejudice" isn't exactly a new idea, but I loved how the social conflict was between a human girl (who absorbed the aliens' revulsion toward the color blue) and every human around her, parent and peer, which both grounded the story and provided it an extra dimension beyond the stale old trope. An engaging and effective tale.

"The Washer from the Ford" by Sean McMullen. "I should have said something sensitive and caring, but just then I was feeling like the only person on Earth who had the right to be a victim." There's just something so privileged white male about this story, and that sentence encapsulates it quite well. The narrator-hero does high-level IT support and has been cursed to be ignored by everyone around him, so despite his achievements and his PhD, he never gets the success and recognition he deserves: "...you have great talent and achieve a lot but get nowhere." The curse was inflicted upon him at the behest of a "mousy tart" he ignored in his college stud days. In the end, he wins out over the fey being who wants to take back his gift of second sight—fifteen years of involuntary celibacy have given him the fortitude to resist her sexual temptations. I liked this Melbourne-set tale of murders and supernatural bargains and counterbargains just fine—it was competently constructed, and I'm always a sucker for fey urban fantasy—but oh my lord, you couldn't write a story more tailored for the self-pitying middle-aged middle-class privileged white male demographic if you tried. There's so much to unpack here.

Being a fantasy story set in Australia, "Washer" presents a problem related but perpendicular to the one raised by Patricia Wrightson's The Ice Is Coming. Rather than appropriating local Aboriginal folklore, McMullen populates his Melbourne with creatures of European legend, erasing local beliefs altogether.

"Tactical Infantry Bot 37 Dreams of Trochees" by Marie Vibbert. A brutal yet beautiful rumination on how profitability stimulates permanent states of warfare. "War robot learns poetry and refuses to fight again" sounds like some 1960s concept-based sci-fi, but this story is effective, even though it's far from new.

"Fifteen Minutes from Now" by Erin Cashier. Akin to "Survey," this is another all-verbal piece about bloodshed and torture and techno-beaurocrats being cavalier with human lives, this time from a time-travel angle. A bit of a yawn, especially with another story so structurally and thematically similar earlier in this same issue.

"The Fall from Griffin's Peak" by Pip Coen. An amusing, unexpectedly moving, thoroughly enjoyable romp with an archetypal rogue who gets in over her head. Spoilers: I want to recycle the "glue the rogue to the chair" bit for a future D&D campaign. I think it might be tied with "Blue as Blood" as my favorite piece in this issue.

And that's it! While I know that not every story can be a winner, I was somewhat flabbergasted to read so many that just didn't do it for me. Apparently my mental picture of F&SF as the best match for my personal style was mistaken. Or maybe this was just an off issue. Either way, I have stacks of back issues I plan to read in the months and years to come.

Tuesday, December 4, 2018

2018 read #24: The Electric State by Simon Stålenhag.

The Electric State by Simon Stålenhag
141 pages
Published 2017
Read December 4
Rating: 4 out of 5

I hadn't known anything about Stålenhag's work aside from a vague impression formed by the covers of his books. I had a general idea that he painted vivid scenes of everyday life in bucolic settings juxtaposed with vast science-fictional machinery and mechanical horrors, but I thought his books were more or less themed coffee table works, full of artwork that would tell its story essentially without commentary. I haven't had the opportunity to handle his other two books yet, but The Electric State is very much not a wordless coffee table book.

The gruesome tale of civilization collapsing as its denizens escape into a virtual reality wouldn't be anything special on its own. Stålenhag's haunting and heartbreaking paintings, however, elevate the pedestrian cyberpunk tale of stillbirths and a nascent hive-mind in search of its organic god. Likewise, the context the words give to the paintings enhances them, filling the images with sounds and thoughts and tension. It is an effective storytelling combination, and it left me eager to seek out Stålenhag's other works.

Thursday, September 10, 2015

2015 read #48: The Martian by Andy Weir.

The Martian by Andy Weir
369 pages
Published 2014 (originally published as an ebook 2011)
Read from September 9 to September 10
Rating: ★★★½ out of 5

I will say this for The Martian: I haven't been this hooked on turning pages since All Clear by Connie Willis, way back in January. Actually, considering that I read 369 pages in a matter of ten hours, this may be my fastest reading pace of the year so far (which, admittedly, isn't saying much -- it's been a bad year for my reading pace). Easy readability is not the same as high literature, however. Weir's narrative voice for his stranded astronaut's logs (and occasional verbal recordings, which mysteriously possess the same cadence and sentence structure the character uses in writing, which must make him a bore at parties) is the snarky geek voice familiar from a thousand tech and science blogs, which no doubt contributes to the internet's seemingly universal esteem for this book. Unfortunately, the astronaut's log gets interrupted by boilerplate scenes of technicians discovering problems and administrators holding meeting after meeting in conference rooms, scenes which felt wholly out of place, more suited for a Crichton-esque airport thriller. Perhaps those interruptions were added to "polish" Weir's self-published manuscript for the Big Time? They certainly felt tacked on, as did all the faceless technician and bureaucrat characters that fill out the scenes.

Nevertheless, what Weir produced here is an excellent example of its type, and I'm eager to see how thoroughly Matt Damon botches the central role in the movie version next month.

Thursday, November 20, 2014

2014 read #108: The Year's Best Science Fiction & Fantasy, 2010 Edition, edited by Rich Horton.

The Year's Best Science Fiction & Fantasy, 2010 Edition, edited by Rich Horton
533 pages
Published 2010
Read from January 26 to November 20
Rating: ★★½ out of 5

When I first picked this one up back in January, I was still trying to recapture the short story mania I'd so enjoyed in the final third of 2013. I got up to "As Women Fight" before sputtering out and, eventually, returning the book for the ensuing nine months. Since I'd read so much in the book (much more than I remembered reading), I decided I should make an effort to finish it this year; my organized side detests the thought of carrying a partially read book over from year to year.

Just a general warning with short story anthologies: It helps me remember each story later if I describe the plot in spoiler-y detail, so if you care about such things, maybe skip this review. I don't know if anyone actually reads these things, so that's probably not worth saying.

For reference purposes, these stories were originally published in 2009.

"A Story, with Beans" by Steven Gould. Genre fiction (or at least post-1950s SF) has a tendency toward bloat. Unnecessary worldbuilding and descriptive detail pile up, and a straightforward tale becomes a meandering, indulgent multivolume epic if the sales numbers support it. This story takes the opposite route, sketching out a post-collapse American Southwest, with suggestions of strange cults, strange cultures, strange tech, metal-eating "bugs," and unseen history, in just seven pages. I appreciate the light touch with worldbuilding -- I crave more but don't feel cheated. When it comes to the story itself, however, it's a letdown, abbreviated to an anecdote a ranger tells to some college kids over a pot of beans. There's no emotional weight to it at all. As an exercise in brevity, "A Story" is impressive, but it lacks depth. (Discovering, some months later, that Gould expanded this setting into a novel makes it somewhat less impressive, retroactively making it seem more like a teaser trailer for the upcoming book rather than a standalone story with a lot going on behind it. Oh well.)

"Child-Empress of Mars" by Theodora Goss. Another exercise in brevity, a pastiche of "Old Mars" stories parodying genre terminology and complicated worldbuilding in eight crisp, efficient pages. The point is a rather banal observation about the value of tragic hero stories, the sort of metafictional vein SF mines to exhaustion. Nonetheless a sweet and engaging little tale.

"The Island" by Peter Watts. Where "Child-Empress of Mars" used the cliche of fantasy terminology to efficiently (and with tongue in cheek) set the Old Mars scene, "The Island" belongs to a subset of hard sci-fi that uses a sleek and stylized argot to achieve an effect impenetrable to anyone without lifetime subscriptions to Analog and Scientific American. I find this style tiresome and silly. The story itself isn't that bad, though it is crammed with the usual list of hard sci-fi requirements: a high concept meant to be mind-blowing but is merely implausible, tension between humans and an AI on a space journey that lasts millions of years, an attempt at philosophical insight, incest. My interest curve climbed slowly from almost nil at the start to pretty interested toward the end, before asymptoting to nil again at the end.

"The Logic of the World" by Robert Kelly. This one would not have felt out of place in that After the King anthology. It is a consummately '90s fantasy story, smugly didactic, wherein a sensitive, thoughtful knight learns of a dragon and goes to slay it, only to get lectured with certain cliches about wisdom and how you take in a little bit of everything you slay, and then the knight is sorry and he leaves. All we need are some dated pop culture references and "irreverent" humor, and it could be 1992 all over again!

"The Long, Cold Goodbye" by Holly Phillips. Not an all-time classic, but a dazzling exercise in worldbuilding and viewing a high fantasy cliche from a fresh angle. This story mixes together colonialism, steampunk, ice zombies, a city freezing to death in a masquerade of forced jollity pasted over bone-deep despair. The tone never quite gelled with me -- too close to melodrama -- and the prose was solid but unmemorable. Still, this is the first really really good story in this collection.

"The Endangered Camp" by Ann Leckie. There's something ineffably '90s about intelligent dinosaurs managing to invent space flight just before an asteroid plows into the Yucatan. There was a trilogy of novels by Robert J. Sawyer that built on the idea, plus (I'm told) an episode of Star Trek: Voyager. Here it's dated but cute, a winsome but pointless little fantasy that doesn't overstay its welcome.

"Dragon's Teeth" by Alex Irvine. Perfectly adequate swords 'n' sorcery number, satisfying if not especially memorable. (Nine months later, in fact, I have zero idea what this story was about, and little memory of reading it, which makes the one-line review I wrote at the time less than helpful. For posterity, then, I shall specify that it appears to be a pseudo-Roman swords 'n' sorcery number, with a humble no-nonsense soldier or something going to hunt a MacGuffin among fantasy-world Inuit or something. I don't really know, I merely skimmed a few sentences to get a sense of the piece again.)

"As Women Fight" by Sara Genge. This one defeated me back in February (or whenever it was that I shelved this collection). Psyching myself up to once again wade through it took weeks, even if I didn't quite remember why I'd given up in the first place. Conceptually it's an interesting tale -- the two partners in a breeding pair must Fight each year to win the role of female, with the loser consigned to maleness until the next Fight (which is just a variation on The Left Hand of Darkness, but still has some potential juice in it). Yet, frustratingly, "Women" relies on essentialist conceits of what it "means" to be female or male. Five years of losses have left the p.o.v. character "imprinted" with the ways of male "flesh": "Silence comes easy these days," Genge writes, as if laconic affectlessness is an essential trait of manhood rather than a mutable quality specified by culture. A reasonable grounding in history and anthropology is not much to ask, especially if one wishes to spin tales of gender identity in the style of Le Guin, but we live in an era when it's fashionable once more, even among supposedly feminist authors, to ascribe all the sitcom gender norms to biology. But... overlooking all that, with a supreme effort of resignation... I must admit this isn't a bad story. In fact, the story qua story is well-constructed, fitting the concept and storyline together seamlessly, barely wasting a single noun of worldbuilding. And if I strain my (admittedly undeveloped) critical faculties, maybe I can sort of see how Genge might not have been so essentialist all along: in one bit of dialog, after the point where I'd given up all those months ago, a mouthpiece character offers, "We've learned since childhood that women do this or that and we never dare to break free of that mold. We're as pitiful as the men and women... who only know one way of living, except that we don't have the excuse of ignorance." Authorial intent here is a tough nut (for me) to crack. Let's just say that I feel this story is too gender-essentialist for my tastes, but maybe its heart is in the right place, and it really wasn't worth all the fuss I put up about it, so let's move on.

"Sylgarmo's Proclamation" by Lucius Shepard. I don't know what to expect of Shepard. He wrote "The Man Who Painted the Dragon Griaule," which remains one of my all-time favorite pieces, but everything else I've read from him has been retreading Vietnam War ground, a sure way to bore me. Editor Horton, in his poorly proofread introduction, calls this story an "hommage" to Jack Vance; the publication history confirms it was originally printed in a Dying Earth anthology. The only Dying Earth story I've read before this was "The Overworld," in Modern Classics of Fantasy; like "The Overworld," "Sylgarmo" is purple stuff, full of imaginative imagery but expressed with a pugnacious lack of subtlety, eventually finding its way to a stock evil cousin who affects to have forgotten "that blond poppet" who got fridged all those years ago to give the hero his motivation. Perhaps the effect is meant to be tongue in cheek, or perhaps merely a pastiche of '70s spaceships 'n' sorcery. A junk food kind of story.

"Three Twilight Tales" by Jo Walton. Characters in fables who are aware they're characters in fables have become, for me at least, almost as commonplace as the archetypal storylines they comment upon. So this string of vignettes is nothing new. That said, these interconnected tales are as delicately worked and beautiful as you'd expect from Walton.

"Necroflux Day" by John Meaney. This kind of scene-setting, where people are just like us with their Parent-Teacher nights and birthday dinners at restaurants, except everything is suffused with magic and the nuns are in the Order of Thanatos and chocolate is blue, can easily capsize into a cloying mess. This story takes its time to spool out a workmanlike domestic drama, with a widowed father, a boy figuring out his own powers (and responsibilities), and a young teacher with a past she's fleeing. It's almost like a '90s kiddie flick where the kid sets his dad up with a new mom, except with, you know, the boy's eyes weeping blood-spiders and with lifetimes of pain stored in the bones and nerves of the dead to be unleashed as magical fuel for ships and cities. "It is impossible to know where the power comes from," writes the boy, in the essay he's so proud of, "if you can't imagine how the bones hurt and scream." It is a strange ensemble, but it mostly hangs together.

"The Persistence of Memory; or, This Space for Sale" by Paul Park. I have mixed feelings about this one. It's a clever little piece, all metafictional and such, but the ending is the cheap "unreliable narrator was talking about his life and ex-girlfriend all along" trick we've all seen a hundred times, which gets less satisfying each time.

"This Peaceable Land; or, The Unbearable Vision of Harriet Beecher Stowe" by Robert Charles Wilson. A title like that deserves -- demands -- a story of uncommon excellence. Like "The Cartographer Wasps and the Anarchist Bees" or "Bears Discover Fire," or "The Radiant Car Thy Sparrows Drew" later in this volume, it's a title that leaps off the contents page and effervesces in my brain, filling me with anticipation and speculation. Further, I have positive memories of the two Wilson novels I read a decade or more ago (Darwinia and The Chronoliths), so it's fair to say I had heightened expectations for this story. It turns out to be heavy material, a look at the horrors and entrepreneur-run concentration camps that could have resulted had America not gone into Civil War. My one objection is a sense that Wilson is inadvertently minimizing the real horrors of the black experience after the Civil War, a scene in American history generally swept out of sight as it is, but on its own this story is excellent and unsettling. Probably the third best in the book.

"On the Human Plan" by Jay Lake. More Dying Earth-esque business, but substituting latter day archetypes of crusty nanotech information brokers for the old brew of decadent wizards and sly heroes. I'm not sure it's an improvement. Neither bad nor good.

"Technicolor" by John Langan. You can kind of guess where this one is going on the first page, but there's a sort of delicious anticipation to watching the pieces of the story form a remorseless chain toward the denouement. "Classic story gets reinterpreted through a lit-crit lens" is babby's first postmodernism, but this is really well done.

"Catalog" by Eugene Mirabelli. A lightweight fancy in what I think of as a Valente-esque vein, in which a blank slate sort of guy finds himself in a reality pieced together from books and magazines, hanging out with a trio of Poe characters who've formed a rock band, before he goes off to Maine in search of a woman from the L. L. Bean catalog. Cute but something of a trifle.

"Crimes and Glory" by Paul McAuley. I can't point to any particular stories off the top of my head (aside from "Nahiku West" by Linda Nagata, from another Year's Best volume I abandoned early this year, and consequently never reviewed), but I have the impression that hard, grimy sci-fi and noirish detective procedurals get combined much too frequently. It is a go-to stylistic shorthand that yields diminishing returns each time I see it. And this is a 45 page novelette originally published in Subterranean, the late and bafflingly overrated magazine that rivaled Analog for the title of least enjoyable pro market. "Crimes and Glory," in other words, is a slog. Characters in this story proclaim their motivations to each other in clumsy exposition straight out of a creative writing elective; tiresome technobabble dribbles along with few surprises and no zest; the set-dressings and descriptions are as familiar and unappealing as Tuesday's leftovers. "You see," the escaping criminal tells the pursuing detective, "you aren't very different from me after all," and the ending is obvious. If I weren't so determined to finish this collection sometime this year, I might have washed my hands of it once again partway through this story.

"Eros, Philia, Agape" by Rachel Swirsky. Emotionally manipulative but mostly effective piece. Any story with a four year old in emotional disarray will hit me hard, of course, but this story is well-written, even if its heroine is much too leisure class for my tastes.

"A Painter, a Sheep, and a Boa Constrictor" by Nir Yaniv (translated from the Hebrew by Lavie Tidhar). A brief but charmingly strange fable straddling fairy tale and high technology, breathing life into the cliches of both.

"Glister" by Dominic Green. A rollickingly old-fashioned roister-doister tale of space miners on a hellish planet rife with gold and an explosive biochemistry based on heavy metals. Not an amazing story, but a fun antidote to the usual 21st century grim and grime.

"The Qualia Engine" by Damien Broderick. This reads like one of those forced, painfully dated stories from the '80s or early '90s, except updated to include fresher cliches and fumbling pop culture references to Survivor and Beauty and the Geek and Second Life, stereotype jocks "porking" cheerleaders while stereotype power-nerds sweat through "I know eight silent ways to kill a man" fantasies, all narrated in a snide voice just two steps down from excruciating. Ten years from now, someone will read this and snark at how quaintly '00s it was. It's a shame, given that imagination-stirring title. The story itself is workmanlike stuff, bravely attempting to Say Things About the Human Condition but mostly just getting lost in its own brimming-with-attitude narration.

"The Radiant Car Thy Sparrows Drew" by Catherynne M. Valente. This, thankfully, lives up to its title. Valente has a tendency to use cardboard standees as props -- here the central figure is a Generic Badass Woman in a More Commonly Male Role, a stock Valente creation. But you don't read Valente for nuanced characterization. You read Valente for lush, baffling, seductive imagery, the turns and depths of dreams you never dared to have, places as insidious as myth, clocks that flow rather than tick along their own necessary geometries. I'll be the first to say I have no idea what's going on here, and that's okay -- I am dazzled and left wordless. Valente in prime form; by a long shot the best story in this collection.

"Wife-Stealing Time" by R. Garcia y Robertson. The only Garcia y Robertson book I've read, Firebird, was like stuffing my face with a pizza from Domino's. For the first little while it was tasty, a novel treat mixing Russian mythology with sexy fun adventures. As I kept gorging, though, I realized it really wasn't that good, and in fact it was gross and threatening to go out the way it came in. I've shied away from anything bearing his name ever since, in much the same way one's stomach might cringe at the thought of repeating a particularly unpleasant junk food. This story seems to confirm Garcia y Robertson's inclination to leer, yuk-yukking it up in a parody of oversexed pulp lotharios and "teenaged" seductresses (though Barsoomian years are twice as long as Earth's, so you're the one with the dirty mind, pal). The result is almost -- almost -- Piers Anthony levels of unfunny, and at least ten pages too long. I cannot believe this got published in Asimov's. I always expected better from that market.

"Images of Anna" by Nancy Kress. Competent but uninspired magical realism piece. Online dating a wizard or something, and photographs that show thoughts and worries, or something.

"Mongoose" by Sarah Monette and Elizabeth Bear. Interdimensional creature feature colored by Alice in Wonderland, playful and enjoyable without treading new ground or digging in deep.

"Living Curiousities" by Margo Lanagan. Dense-packed scene-setting that tosses you in near the middle and demands you keep up, a stylistic accomplishment that ends up being a brief character study, closing abruptly once its mood is made clear. Expanding this out to give it room to breathe may have been an improvement, or maybe the slim statement here benefits from the compressed presentation.

"The Death of Sugar Daddy" by Toiya Kristen Finley. A strange and vertiginous tale of erasure and urban neglect, vivid and marvelous and sad, the second best story in this anthology after "The Radiant Car Thy Sparrows Drew."

"Secret Identity" by Kelly Link. I wound up liking this more than I thought it would. Integrating online gaming into science fiction stories is generally hokey, and often embarrassing, as is the exploration of long distance relationships and online dating (which was the focus of "Images of Anna," as well, so it must have been A Thing in 2009), all of which made for a rocky start. But the narration is so earnest and believable, a voice familiar to anyone who read their share of emotionally inexperienced introverts pouring their hearts into LiveJournal entries way back when (or was one such introvert) -- that disarming and quietly frantic reaction to life, the antithesis to the snarky swagger of, say, the narrator of "The Qualia Engine" (and any number of stories I rejected from my own short-lived magazine). The backdrop of deliberately banal superheroes is more entertaining than the similar device in Jonathan Lethem's "Super Goat Man" five years earlier (reviewed here). The sum total is really good, one of the very few really good stories in this collection. Though I had one reservation: Is it overlong, or is that just me growing impatient to finally finish this book and move on to something else?

"Bespoke" by Genevieve Valentine. I don't like the word "bespoke," partly because it seems to have become an it-word in recent years, partly because it feels jammed together and awkward on my tongue. Of course, that's neither here nor there. This is an airy character study mingling the delicate imagery of current intimate fantasy with the melancholy of current post-collapse speculation, garnished with some old-school (ca. early '60s) time travel goofiness. Interesting but too brief and reserved.

"Events Preceding the Helvetican Renaissance" by John Kessel. A cracking good time, this one. The sort of fun and imaginative far-future space adventure I get to read so seldom, and always enjoy when done well. Not nearly as ambitious as, say, Gene Wolfe's "The Fifth Head of Cerberus" (reviewed here), but that's the general sort of thing Kessel was aiming for, I think. At least it isn't the sort of dreary, grimy pessimism de rigueur in this grimy and pessimistic century.

Whew. There. From January to November, it took me, but finally I can put this book back on the shelf. I think the 2012 edition of Year's Best deceived me. This book simply did not have the same ratio of outstanding stories to filler that made that anthology (the first of Horton's I read) so rewarding. Perhaps Horton had yet to develop the curatorial skills or reprint rights budget he would have in 2012, or (unlikely, but possible) perhaps the short fiction of 2009 just wasn't as happening as it would be in 2011. One of these months I need to look into the other annuals, the Hartwell/Cramer fantasy series and the Strahan SF one, even if it involves much overlap; I desire a different perspective on what might be considered the "best" stories of any given year.