Showing posts with label science. Show all posts
Showing posts with label science. Show all posts

Saturday, December 6, 2025

2025 read #93: Strata by Laura Poppick.

Strata: Stories from Deep Time by Laura Poppick
Illustrations by Sarah Gilman
244 pages
Published 2025
Read from December 4 to December 6
Rating: 3 out of 5

My perennial wish: more pop science books intended for people who are well-versed in the basics and want something more.

Strata is not that book. In her prologue, Poppick writes that she intends this book for folks who maybe haven’t thought about rocks before — an introduction to Deep Time to get more people to engage with the geology, and the world, around them. Noble, especially in our dismal age of anti-intellectualism. But it’s a bummer that this is the majority of what popular science has to offer as a genre.

Poppick does the science journalist thing of interviewing colorful experts, spending a significant chunk of the text sketching personalities via anecdotes of fieldwork or risky bush piloting. I get why human interest stories are so prominent, given the tastes of the audience. It’s also good to contextualize scientists as human beings, especially when we consider the history of white men excluding everyone else from science for so long (and pressuring other demographics out of the field to this day). I want more than that, though.

Clearly, what I want is something closer to a college textbook. Which isn’t the fault of this book in particular, but rather the nonfiction publishing market at large.

Poppick unpacks four broad “stories”: the oxygenation of the atmosphere; the Cryogenian; the rise of terrestrial plants and, with them, mud; and the thermal maxima of the Mesozoic. Each of these is investigated with an eye toward a better understanding of our current moment of global catastrophe. If it helps even a handful of people understand the perils of the present through an appreciation of the past, I’ll count this book as a success.

As one scientist she interviews says, “[P]eople could be more happy if they spent more time looking at rocks.” I can’t argue with that.

Monday, November 10, 2025

2025 read #84: Kindred by Rebecca Wragg Sykes.

Kindred: Neanderthal Life, Love, Death and Art by Rebecca Wragg Sykes
Illustrated by Alison Atkin and Marc Dando
390 pages
Published 2020
Read from November 5 to November 10
Rating: 3.5 out of 5

When I got my BA in Anthropology, way back in the late ’00s, the consensus on Neanderthals was that they were an over-specialized branch of hominin evolution, hyper-carnivores eking a meager living on the edge of the habitable world, oddly stagnant in culture across deep reaches of time, dead without descendants. They may have buried their dead, took care of their disabled cohorts, and utilized mineral pigments, but otherwise seemed to demonstrate no conception of art. It was deemed unlikely that they could make complex and varied vocal sounds. Neanderthals were depicted as a tragic curiosity, offering insight into adaptation and extinction—fellow travelers crowded out by our own species or starved by the loss of habitat.

The beautiful thing about science is that we’re always learning more, and adapting what we think we know to adjust to new information. Thanks to genetic sequencing, we know H. sapiens interbred with Neanderthals (and other related populations). We’ve found evidence of rudimentary sculpture and even construction. Neanderthals lived in and adapted to a broad diversity of environments. They also seem to have engaged in some measure of cannibalism as mortuary ritual. It’s a more nuanced picture by far.

Of course, the very dynamism of science means that this book, a mere five years out of date, might not be worth reading for all I know. Still, Kindred is one of the few science books in my library, and five years out of date is better than my education, which is approaching twenty years old.

Sykes, like so many scientists turned pop-sci writers before her, produces a readable but often uninspired text that feels like she tried too hard to keep her wording casual. It’s a style choice that strikes me as condescending. Each chapter begins with a sensory immersion sequence in italics, which can sometimes still be fun, but here just feels awkward. She also tries to slip in the occasional poetic flourish, which falls flat more often than not.

That said, I love science, I miss studying human evolution and prehistory, and this book is a perfectly adequate refresher. Once it gets past the de rigueur background information, Kindred offers fascinating and detailed looks at everything from Neanderthals’ health and injuries, to granular examinations of the climates and environments they experienced, to extensive inventories of their varied foodways. From there, it sketches more speculative pictures of Neanderthal aesthetics and emotions. It’s a solid pop primer, so far as I can tell with my outdated background. It also offers a gratifying amount of depth that these treatments rarely provide.

Monday, September 29, 2025

2025 read #73: The Forest Primeval by Leo J. Hickey.

The Forest Primeval: The Geologic History of Wood and Petrified Forests by Leo J. Hickey
62 pages
Published 2003
Read September 29
Rating: 3 out of 5

Earlier this month, my partner R and I visited the Yale Peabody Museum. (It’s free!) I’m currently hyperfocusing on fossil plants and ancient ecosystems, partly because of the novels I’m writing, partly because it’s a dang cool topic. When I found this slim volume in the gift shop, I couldn’t pass it up.

It’s a scientist’s idea of a primer for non-specialists, which means we get thrown into a welter of terminology with only the barest effort to define it. I’m still shaky on the distinction between a wood section’s radial face and its transverse face. One shoddy diagram is considered sufficient explanation; the terms aren’t defined in the glossary. And because the book is over twenty years old, I can only surmise how much of it has been superseded by more recent lines of evidence.

Still, I love paleobotany, and this is a neat appetizer for the more technical books I’ve been pricing in recent weeks. If you ever happen to read my forthcoming paleo-fiction and find a reference to Cretaceous highland meadows of Ephedra plants, you can credit this book.

Wednesday, September 3, 2025

2025 read #61: In the Presence of Dinosaurs by John Colagrande and Larry Felder.

In the Presence of Dinosaurs by John Colagrande and Larry Felder
Illustrated by Larry Felder
Foreword by Jack Horner
189 pages
Published 2000
Read from August 30 to September 3
Rating: 2.5 out of 5

One tiny blessing of being born when I was: my teenage years coincided with history’s biggest boom of dinosaur books. There were novels, most of them bad. Short stories in magazines, some of them good. And then there were the big, glossy, full-color illustrated books for adults. I spent substantial portions of the late 1990s reading through some outsize coffee-table book or other (Hunting Dinosaurs, Dinosaurs:A Global View, The Ultimate Dinosaur). Those were glorious times.

One of the very last tomes of that particular wave (that I’m aware of) was this one, which came out during my painful transition into adulthood. I picked up a copy at some point in the early 2000s, possibly back when my then-spouse and I would hang out at Borders every weekend, blowing untold amounts of money on stacks of books we would scarcely look afterward. I got rid of that copy in a subsequent move. It wasn’t until this summer that I found a cheap (if slightly battered) replacement.

Presence is organized into chapters by specific environments: rain forest, plains, coastline, and so on. Grounding dinosaurs into ecological context is something I’m interested in, both as a would-be scientist and as a novelist. So some twenty-ish years later, I’m finally taking the time to read it.

Felder’s artwork is outstanding. Finely detailed, almost photographically sharp, with the occasional startling chiaroscuro. In addition, this might be one of the earliest glossy art books to normalize feathered dinosaurs, which gives it some historical interest.

The written portions of the book are considerably less edifying. The text lacks flow, and is frequently repetitive, resulting in a dull read — even though not all that much information is presented. Clearly the art was expected to be the main draw.

Presence puts into perspective how much dinosaur paleontology has changed in the last quarter century. When I read a confident declaration that “Dinosaurs descended from partially aquatic ancestors,” it’s a reminder of just how long ago Y2K was, and also a prompt to take everything else here with a grain of salt. Perhaps not the most useful research I could be doing for my own books.

Also inspiring caution: fundamental errors, like dating the Morrison Formation to 220-200 million years ago, instead of its actual range of 156-146 million years ago. What do you mean that got through editors and typesetters without getting caught?

Still, the book’s focus on climate and cohesive ecosystems (rather than charismatic megafauna roving through a greenscreen void) is welcome, and perhaps a bit ahead of its time. And I can’t deny that it’s a little bit inspiring. Do I now want to write stories set in Late Triassic Arizona, Early Jurassic Connecticut, and Late Cretaceous Interior Seaway barrier islands? Absolutely!

Tuesday, August 19, 2025

2025 read #54: When the Earth Was Green by Riley Black.

When the Earth Was Green: Plants, Animals, and Evolution’s Greatest Romance by Riley Black
Illustrated by Kory Bing
281 pages
Published 2025
Read from August 2 to August 19
Rating: 3.5 out of 5

We need more paleobotany and paleoecology books. I’m in the process of writing a novel set partially in the Cretaceous, and there are so few avenues for learning what ancient environments would have been like. A particular textbook sells for $500 on eBay. Wikipedia has a couple useful pages, but even a ubiquitous Upper Cretaceous tree like Dryophyllum lacks its own entry. In fact, the most thorough online source of information about Dryophyllum that I can find appears to be a fandom wiki for a video game.

Heading into this book, I’d hoped for more in the vein of the closing chapters of Riley Black’s The Last Days of the Dinosaurs, which linked the Earth’s past with our own contemporary fights for personal autonomy and queer liberation. There are bits of that here and there; the introduction, in particular, can be quite lovely in its musings on life’s interconnectedness and interdependence. Certain chapters, such as the one on fall color in the Pliocene, are beautiful and evocative. The conclusion is, once again, especially impactful, a much-needed reflection of human diversity and possibility.

For the most part, though, Green offers more of the Raptor Red-adjacent pop science that characterized most of Last Days. It’s enjoyable, and Black covers many topics not often seen by the public at large, which is always welcome. This book is a nice first step for introducing the reading public to the plants of the past, but it’s only that — a first step. Let’s hope it starts a paleobotanical revival and leads to more in-depth books gaining publication.

Saturday, August 2, 2025

2025 read #53: Uncovering Dinosaur Behavior by David Hone.

Uncovering Dinosaur Behavior: What They Did and How We Know by David Hone
Illustrated by Gabriel Ugueto
176 pages
Published 2024
Read from July 28 to August 2
Rating: 4 out of 5

Circa 1998, I was as up to date on dinosaur science as it was possible for a semi-homeless teenager with no formal education to be. There were comprehensive popular overviews and specialist encyclopedias in every library. Those were good times for amateur dinosaur aficionados.

In 2025, we’re in the midst of a much smaller dinosaur renaissance. There are quite lovely new books that do innovative, edifying, expressive things with the topic. But none are the lavish, comprehensive pop-science tomes you used to get in the ’90s. So I’m not scientifically “up to date” the same way, and it’s unlikely I ever will be.

This book is a step toward catching up at least a little bit, though. In particular, Behavior provides a solid foundation for considering non-avian dinosaurs as once-living animals with complex behaviors and interactions with their environment. A lot of recent work in dinosaur science has been, shall we say, excessively optimistic about what behaviors can be recovered from the fossil record. Hone’s approach lays out the diverse possibilities of dinosaur behavior, while cautioning against conclusions drawn from sparse fossil data: “[M]uch of the scientific literature tends toward a confidence in interpreting dinosaur behaviors that probably should not be there….”

I would love a greatly expanded version of this book. Its main weakness, to my taste, is its summary nature. Fascinating glimpses of dinosaur behavior are reduced to a single sentence plus a reference to a paper that I lack access to. I’d prefer a book two or three times longer, giving proper paragraphs (if not subheadings) to more case studies. But even as it stands, Behavior helps break down the movie myths of dinosaurs we all absorbed in the 1990s. A useful starting point for anyone who might want to write more realistic dino fic in the near future.

Sunday, December 1, 2024

2024 read #147: A History of Dinosaurs in 50 Fossils by Paul M. Barrett.

A History of Dinosaurs in 50 Fossils by Paul M. Barrett
160 pages
Published 2024
Read from November 30 to December 1
Rating: 3 out of 5

Much like A History of Plants in Fifty Fossils, this is a coffee table book illustrated with photographs of the namesake fifty fossils, presenting a brief, glossy overview of dinosaur science. Unlike Plants, I went into Dinosaurs knowing quite a lot about the subject matter. The state of science publishing is dire, however, so I’ll take what I can get at this point. And I’ve been out of the loop with dinosaur science long enough that I might learn things even from a pop science book.

Considering the limitations of its structure, A History of Dinosaurs does a fair job at doling out beginner information: what defines dinosaurs, their evolutionary origins, their diversity and adaptations, and so on. The illustrations include paleo-reconstruction artwork as well as fossil photos, which was nice. While I do wish popular science books would return to trusting their audience instead of spoon-feeding them printed listicles, this one wasn’t a bad effort.

Thursday, November 21, 2024

2024 read #142: Cunning Folk by Tabitha Stanmore.

Cunning Folk: Life in the Era of Practical Magic by Tabitha Stanmore
232 pages
Published 2024
Read from November 15 to November 21
Rating: 3 out of 5

Reading this book immediately after Magic: A History wasn't serendipity; I had Cunning Folk checked out from the library and waiting. It provides some of the depth I had longed for when reading Magic. As a history, Cunning Folk offers a Peter Ackroyd-like sampler of primary-source anecdotes from aristocrat and commoner alike, spanning from the Medieval through the Early Modern period. It isn’t memorably well-written or especially eye-opening, but it’s solid enough.

Friday, November 15, 2024

2024 read #141: Magic: A History by Chris Gosden.

Magic: A History: From Alchemy to Witchcraft, from the Ice Age to the Present by Chris Gosden
465 pages
Published 2020
Read from October 15 to November 15
Rating: 3 out of 5

It's been a long time since I regularly read nonfiction. When I say I struggled with this book, that’s entirely on me. (And on the election. And on life stress before that.) Gosden’s prose is dry and a touch academic, but should be quite readable to anyone whose attention span hasn’t been fried by the last four, eight, twelve years of ~everything~.

And right in the middle of reading this book, we got set back so many decades, and have so many decades of work ahead of us to undo the damage, if it can even be undone.

Magic is a broad overview (perhaps too broad) of the role and practice of magic in human societies over the last forty thousand or so years. The scope of Gosden’s thesis tends to crowd and minimize each region and time period, with sometimes unfortunate results. It’s one thing to say that life during the Ice Age is beyond the conception of modern minds; it’s quite another to write “Understanding Chinese thought and action requires considerable imaginative effort, but is definitely worthwhile.” Wild to see something that amounts to the cliche of the “inscrutable East” get published in 2020.

Gosden’s occasional otherization aside, I would love for any of these chapters to get expanded into a full length book. My own bias would be for Paleolithic, Mesolithic, or Neolithic cultures, or perhaps for Early Modern learned magic, but I would adore a more in-depth examination of anything in here.

Thursday, July 18, 2024

2024 read #83: The Dinosaurs by William Stout.

The Dinosaurs: A Fantastic New View of a Lost Era, illustrated by William Stout
Text by William Service; edited by Byron Preiss
Introduction by Peter Dodson
160 pages
Published 1981
Read July 18
Rating: 2.5 out of 5 (maybe 3 if I’m generous)

Can we take a moment to notice just how hard Byron Preiss pushed for illustrated dinosaur books for adults? Throughout the decade or so between the Dinosaur Renaissance and the Jurassic Park craze, his name recurs as editorial instigator for a particular sort of publication. We have The Ultimate Dinosaur, Bradbury’s Dinosaur Tales, and this book. Dude was committed to making pop culture dinos happen. I wouldn’t be surprised if there were even more I’ve yet to learn about (especially since he seems linked to Don Glut’s Dinosaur Society, which cashed in on the ’90s dinomania with its own titles).

I forget the context, but I first heard of this book recently from a fellow writer on social media. She grew up paging through William Stout’s artwork and William Service’s accompanying prose vignettes. The cover is absolutely stunning, an art nouveau Parasaurolophus in 1970s kitchen tones. Naturally I wanted it. I was able to find a cheap copy on eBay, and here we are.

Stout’s artwork, inevitably, is the major selling point here. To contemporary eyes, his dinosaurs look lumpy and veiny, perhaps reminiscent of Frank Frazetta’s shadowy barbarians, though the delightful art nouveau influence runs throughout the book. There is a stunning full-page spread of a Leptoceratops beneath a magnolia in full flower that I want framed on my wall. If the book were exclusively composed of Stout’s art, I’d rate it more highly.

Service’s vignettes are, at best, serviceable (heh), a dry run for the fictionalized approach to paleontology that would culminate in Raptor Red. The concepts Service explores, and the pop science terms he deploys, provide a fascinating glimpse of how deep the tropes of ’90s dinomania reach. For example, this is the earliest I’ve ever encountered the usage of “raptor” as a colloquial catch-all for small, fast, sharp-clawed theropods. Even the contemporaneous Time Safari called them dromaeosaurs. Oddly, Service is out of synch with Peter Dodson’s introduction, returning again and again to the trope of cold-blooded dinosaurs stymied by an errant chill.

Some of the vignettes depict speculative behaviors I don’t think I’ve seen touched elsewhere, such as a Styracosaurus instinctively munching tart bark to help purge toxins it had inadvertently eaten. (This is also the only description of dinosaur constipation I’ve ever read: “At times peristaltic waves of contraction passed down the colon; cloacas trembled and everted in vain.”) This treatment of dinos as living animals makes The Dinosaurs a rewarding read even now, with much of its science forty years out of date.

Thursday, March 28, 2024

2024 read #38: Pilgrim at Tinker Creek by Annie Dillard.

Pilgrim at Tinker Creek by Annie Dillard
280 pages
Published 1974
Read from March 13 to March 28
Rating: 4.5 out of 5

Classics of nature writing are haunted by the outlines of everything we’ve destroyed.

In the fifty years since Pilgrim was published, we’ve lost uncountable numbers of birds; insect populations have been in free fall; amphibians have collapsed. The very soil has become sterile, quenched by herbicides and pesticides. Where Dillard pondered the vastness of divinity and the cruel beauty of nature under troublesome clouds of starlings, you might be lucky to see a scatter of sparrows today. Most of Tinker Creek itself, Dillard’s “one great giver,” today seems a ghost watershed, squeezed between the culs-de-sac and fulfillment centers that sprawl out from Roanoke and the I-81 corridor.

The spirit of intellectual Christianity lurking throughout this book is also pretty much extinct. At least it is in America, where the loudest elements of the faith champion a skin-deep literalism, fully commercialized and dead inside. Atheism and Christlike Christianity alike are capable of transcendence, the ecstatic revelations of humility before the infinite; the greatest exaltation an American evangelist can know is browbeating a waitress on a Sunday afternoon.

At its heart, Pilgrim is a book-length consideration of the cruelty within nature’s beauty, a rumination on how any conception of a creator god must incorporate the blood-spill as well as the birdsong, the parasite alongside the petals:

For if God is in one sense the igniter, a fireball that spins over the ground of continents, God is also the destroyer, lightning, blind power, impartial as the atmosphere. 

From an atheist’s point of view, of course, the matter is much clearer, though no less awe-making. We are intelligent animals reliant on our deeply enmeshed social bonds; beauty (or rather the appreciation of it) is the newcomer, yet vital to us nonetheless, as vital as the sometimes bloody workings of mere survival. We are part of nature, inseparable, and that is glory.

I can respect intellectual Christianity, but it has died back faster than the insects have, these last fifty years. In contrast to either atheism or intellectual Christianity, contemporary evangelicalism presents a pop-up picture book understanding of the world, a paper cutout universe merely six thousand years deep, reducing us all to children play-acting for our abusive sky-dad’s jollies. Animals, plants, nature as a whole — all of it recedes into the background art from a Dick & Jane book. I can only imagine how many contemporary Southern Baptists in Dillard’s western Virginia would decry her spiritual masterpiece as evolutionist sacrilege.

I’m pretty sure Robert Macfarlane name-dropped this book in one or more of his tributes to the titans of nature writing past. It’s more than worthy of such notice. Every line jolts or shimmers with the mystery of language, scintillating or concealing in intricate patterns like cloud-shadow tumbling ahead of the wind. At least once a page, this book takes my breath away:

Some trees sink taproots to rock; some spread wide mats of roots clutching at acres. They will not be blown. We run around under these obelisk-creatures, teetering on our soft, small feet. We are out on a jaunt, picnicking, fattening like puppies for our deaths. Shall I carve a name on this trunk? What if I fell in a forest: Would a tree hear?

Like the best nature writing, Pilgrim is about learning to see; and, having seen, sensing how much else exists beyond our awareness. The present is elusive, recursive, a revelation quickly lost in other stimulation. I’m reminded of The Anthropology of Turquoise or A Field Guide to Getting Lost. A magnificent book.

Thursday, December 14, 2023

2023 read #153: Earth Before the Dinosaurs by Sebastien Steyer.

Earth Before the Dinosaurs by Sebastien Steyer
Translated by Chris Spence
Illustrated by Alain Bénéteau
Foreword by Carl Zimmer
181 pages
Published 2009 (English translation published 2012)
Read from December 11 to December 14
Rating: 3 out of 5

I always despair at the general apathy toward science. Public apathy flows into a feedback loop with publishers’ capitalist calculations: amateur interest in scientific primers is sporadic to nonexistent, thus few of them get published for a general audience, thus there’s no way for the public to learn basic science. Plus, with any introductory text in a fast-moving field like paleontology, there’s always the probability that it’ll be outdated within a few years.

I’ve long been interested in the tetrapods (and the ecosystems) that evolved before the dinosaurs, but outside of a few books like Beasts Before Us, there really aren’t any popular introductions. I don’t know enough to know what parts of Earth Before the Dinosaurs might already be outdated — though 2009 feels like a long time ago, in paleontology years, so the concern was hard to avoid as I read it.

Whether it’s because of the original author or because of translation, the text alternates between patronizing and densely technical. The book belabors the importance of using precisely defined terminology, instead of lazy pop science metaphors like “missing link” and “transitional fossil,” yet ironically throws around a ton of jargon without defining it. (I know what sarcopterygians and temnospondyls are, for example. but I’ve been obsessed with evolution and paleontology for thirty years or more.)

Steyer’s central topic is evolutionary relationships, so we get an entire chapter on embryology but not much at all about my primary interest, which is paleoecology. 

The best part of the book, by far, is the luscious artwork by Alain Bénéteau. It amply makes up for any deficiencies of the writing and structure of the book.

Wednesday, November 29, 2023

2023 read #140: A History of Plants in Fifty Fossils by Paul Kenrick.

A History of Plants in Fifty Fossils by Paul Kenrick
160 pages
Published 2020
Read November 29
Rating: 3 out of 5

This is a coffee table book comprising photographs of plant fossils, each with a page or two of descriptive text linking it to some wider topic in botany, evolutionary history, and ecology. Make no mistake: I read this to inflate my book numbers. With a month left in the year, I’m pushing myself to read 150 books in 2023. Maybe even 153, which would break my adult record for most books in one year. (My all-time record, 183, which I hit as a teen in 1996 or 1997, is well beyond my present attention span.)

All that aside, this is a perfectly unremarkable introductory text for the reader who might be curious enough to visit a museum and actually read the placards, but hasn’t had a science class since high school. To illustrate the level of information in this book, the introduction begins: “It’s not easy being a plant.” It’s no Otherlands, but then again, it never set out to be.

The photographs, of course, are the main attraction. They’re frequently stunning, as fossils so regularly are. And this is a whole book of them. Can’t go wrong with that.

Saturday, November 25, 2023

2023 read #137: Forest Walking by Peter Wohlleben and Jane Billinghurst.

Forest Walking: Discovering the Trees and Woodlands of North America by Peter Wohlleben and Jane Billinghurst
206 pages
Published 2022 (some portions originally published as Gebrauchsanweisung für den Wald in 2017, translated by Jane Billinghurst)
Read from November 24 to November 25
Rating: 3 out of 5

I received this book from my partner R for Yule last year, and it's been migrating up and down my to-read stack ever since. It’s the perfect time of year for a read like this, though. Late November is when the forest winds down for the year. Even when atmospheric carbon makes for 80⁰F days, the leaves are mostly gone, the few that remain plinko-ing down bare branches. It's a time to think of spring, to meditate on the life that we (as a species) have not yet managed to eradicate.

This book is shallower than I’d hoped, but charming nonetheless. It rambles through sensory experience, brief anecdote, and science tidbit, very much like a gentle walk through the woods. It’s clearly directed at a general audience, the sort of readers who maybe have a vague fondness for nature but haven't spent much time in forest themselves. The “In Closing” section summarizes Walking as an “appetizer.”

I can’t tell whether it’s because of this intended audience, because of translation, or because most of the book is written in second person, but at times Walking’s voice is reminiscent of 1950s primers for young readers. Here’s a sample line: “Does it sound odd to you that tree roots breathe?” There’s just a smidgen of “kindly uncle welcoming the nieces and nephews to the family cabin” condescension in there. (I recently got a copy of my childhood staple, The Stars by H. A. Rey, so perhaps that’s why the 1950s association is so vivid right now.) The result isn’t as informative as one might hope from the subtitle, but makes a nice way to wile away the dim hours after November sunset.

Saturday, September 9, 2023

2023 read #95: The Ultimate Dinosaur, edited by Byron Preiss and Robert Silverberg.*

The Ultimate Dinosaur: Past • Present • Future, edited by Byron Preiss and Robert Silverberg*
343 pages
Published 1992
Read from September 7 to September 9
Rating: 2 out of 5

* Denotes a reread.

It’s impossible to imagine a book like this getting published any time but the early 1990s.

It’s a hefty coffee-table tome that mixes pop science essays on aspects of dinosaur paleontology with short stories from many of the top names in 1980s sci-fi. You’ll find an entire generation of Discovery Channel-famous paleontologists — Philip Currie, Sankar Chatterjee, Catherine Forster — cheek by jowl with the likes of Harry Harrison, Connie Willis, and Ray Bradbury. There are also sumptuous illustrations (though not enough) from Doug Henderson, William G. Stout, and Wayne D. Barlowe, among others. 

The result is both a coffee-table book too sparsely illustrated to make a good coffee-table book, and an anthology too unwieldy to read with any comfort. But there was money behind this project, that’s for sure. Bantam Books expected to make bank off of it. Retail price was $35 — in 1992 money. I doubt we’ll ever see its like again.

Which is a shame. Why’d the heyday of dinosaur fiction have to happen in the nineties? It truly was one of the grodier eras of sci-fi.

The essays here are predictably dated. I’ll be honest, I only skimmed most of them. As expected, Sankar Chatterjee trots out his usual “birds secretly evolved from crocodylomorphs in the Triassic, I swear” routine. There’s an entire chapter dedicated to Marsh and Cope’s Bone Wars. Other chapters offer little beyond beginner stuff, like “bird-hipped vs. lizard-hipped” and so on. Paleontology has undergone several revolutions since the early ’90s, and it doesn’t seem like much of the nonfiction end of this book is worth revisiting.

The stories in this book, however, had as much influence on my early writing as Jurassic Park and Raptor Red combined. I first encountered The Ultimate Dinosaur sometime around 1993, as a 10 year old prowling unsupervised through the stacks of the Amarillo Public Library. I read most of them far too young to understand half of what was going on. But rereading them now, the first time I’ve read these stories all in sequence, has been a process of rediscovering ancient core memories. As a 17 year old in the Y2K era, I titled a story “Surrey @ Midnight” in clumsy, unconscious tribute to “Siren Song at Midnight.” At 19, one of my first attempts at non-linear storytelling was almost identical in structure to “Major League Triceratops.” And of course “Herding with the Hadrosaurs,” via nearly three decades of convoluted evolution, is the distant origin of my own Timeworld setting (see my story “Across Gondwana’s Heart” in HyphenPunk).

However, as an adult, I’ve found that dinosaur stories are seldom good. Have any of the yarns here held up?

“Crocamander Quest” by L. Sprague de Camp. I read and reviewed this one recently, in de Camp’s time-hunter collection Rivers of Time. (That book, bad as it is, was what inspired me to reread this tome at long last.) In that review, I said, “On one hand, I always had a soft spot for this story because it’s one of the few time-tourist narratives that takes us before the classic ‘Age of Dinosaurs’: Reggie [Rivers] and Chandra Aiyar bring their charges to the Triassic…. On the other hand, this is the tale of their firm’s first and only time safari with a ‘mixed’ company of women and men, which reads just about as badly as you might guess.” I’ll be generous and say C-

“The Feynman Saltation” by Charles Sheffield. This one is a serviceable near-future medical sci-fi piece about a dying artist who gets an experimental cancer treatment and begins to dream scenes from the geological past. There's also a subplot about his doctor beginning to date his sister — which is a bit weird, right? For its time, this is perfectly adequate, though it has little to do with dinosaurs in the end. Maybe C+

“Siren Song at Midnight” by Dave Wolverton. Ah, our first foray into paleo-DNA. In the over-exploited Earth of the nearish future, vast fleets trawl plankton from the sea while, in the deeps below, genetically-engineered “Sirens” fight to keep themselves from starving. It's the kind of intensely nineties future that's full of thumbed commlinks, holo-broadcasts, jacking into the computer network, mem-set, and a capitalized Alliance. BYU alum Wolverton, straining toward his own ideas of Cartagena atmosphere, makes sure to let you know that a Colombian orderly smells of “sweat and beans.” So why is this story in The Ultimate Dinosaur? Our narrator Josephina Elegante has a pet Euparkeria, but otherwise paleo-DNA doesn't play much of a role in this story beyond vibes. Today this reads like reheated leftovers; maybe it seemed better fresh? D

“Rhea’s Time” by Paul Preuss. This story is narrated in the form of a medical case history; the neurologist-cum-hypnotist narrating it can’t help but emphasize the “striking” beauty of Rhea K., as well as the fact that she isn’t wearing a bra in a mountain climbing photo. That feels accurate to male doctors in any era, I suppose. The big twist was pretty obvious to me early on, but in case you don’t want spoilers from a 30+ year old short story, look away: Rhea’s ski accident scrambled her brain waves into recreating the tectonic history of the Earth over the course of twelve months. I imagine Preuss saw the standard “geological history condensed into a calendar year” comparison and thought, “What if this were a hot comatose redhead in a hospital?” The concept is mildly interesting, and there are bits of poetry to be found in the juxtaposition, but the good is outweighed by the narrative choices. D

“Shakers of the Earth” by Gregory Benford. We’ve had two “technobabble in the brain creates subjective experiences of Deep Time” stories, so of course it’s time for our second paleo-DNA story! (Writers in the ’90s had such a limited palette of tropes, didn’t they?) For the maximum ’90s experience, this one gives us a viewpoint from a young Japanese woman playing it cool despite the way some gruff American paleontologist “quickened her body.” I debated whether I should stick an eye-roll emoji here and be done with it. The second half of the story, set five decades later, with cloned Seismosaurus giving rides across Kansas Sauropod Park, is fine, but overall this story is just… there. D+

“Hunters in the Forest” by Robert Silverberg. Desperately conventional “23rd century society has eliminated risk, so a man must travel back in time to Feel Something” bullshit, paired with one of the earliest manic pixie dream girl characters I ever happened to read. I loved this story when I was 10. I’m pretty sure you’d have to be 10 to appreciate it. D

“In the Late Cretaceous” by Connie Willis. Out of every genre writer active in 1992, you’d expect Willis to deliver a solid, well-researched time travel yarn, wouldn’t you? Alas, that is not what we have here. Instead, we get a mildly amusing burlesque of academia, and a still-relevant satire of buzzword-spewing “consultants” hired to slash departments and destroy higher education. Willis manages to maintain loose allegorical parallels to dinosaurs, mainly through the names of the characters (such as the sharp-toothed consultant Dr. King) and recurring motifs of extinction, predation, and evolution. This went far over my head as a tween. Rereading it now, I find it adequately entertaining and fully Willisian, albeit well outside the scope of what I’d expect to read in a dino anthology. B-

“Major League Triceratops” by Barry N. Malzberg. God, I thought this story was the artsiest shit ever when I was a tween. I didn’t understand half of it at the time, but I fully recycled its nonlinear structure (and the Dollar General Cormac McCarthy affectation of leaving out the quotation marks) in my late teen years. Rereading it now, you get slimed by ’90s excess from the very first page. We open with a grody hetero age-gap relationship and the au courant fetishization of a part-Japanese woman, who knows the man doesn’t listen to her. To better condescend to her, he shapes his words into haikus. And then she asks that they go home to fuck. Beyond that, this story tries really hard to be literary, spitting stream of consciousness couplings that sometimes even work, but more often trip over themselves into grandiloquent yammering about some white dude feeling unfulfilled ennui even in the latest Cretaceous. Every man here is serious and existential, every woman air-headed and horny. (One of the women is actually named Muffy.) This was what pretended to be high sci-fi literature at the time, I suppose. Glints of promising prose aren’t enough to save this from its utter lack of having anything interesting to say. All those years I spent emulating this style were built on nothing but muck. D-

“Herding with the Hadrosaurs” by Michael Bishop. More than anything else, this story (and its accompanying artwork) has dominated my writing subconscious for the last thirty years. This isn’t to say it was good. I was absolutely overwhelmed by this story as a wee tween; I spent an inordinate amount of time poring over the painting of a bow hunter, gone mountain-man in the Cretaceous, smoking a pipe atop a dead Corythosaurus. My Timeworld setting has passed through countless permutations over the decades, but ultimately it all goes back to this story and that image. More so than any other story here, I’ve revisited this one over the years; I knew ahead of time that it doesn’t stand up under the weight of nostalgia and adolescent fixation. It feels tossed off on a deadline. Our narrator’s parents are named Pierce and Eulogy in the first paragraph; in the next he writes that their loss “pierces me yet,” and that this story serves as their “eulogy.” That’s some first draft placeholder shit, you know? But that didn’t matter to my younger self. I saw myself and my brother, itinerant and often living in a car, in the siblings at the center of this story, orphaned when their dad drives their New Studebaker wagon through the time-slip into the Late Cretaceous. I yearned to escape our father and follow corythosaurs on their migrations. And honestly, out of all the fiction here (with the exception of Connie Willis’ story above), “Hardosaurs” has aged with the most dignity. Though maybe that’s my nostalgia talking; it certainly has its share of iffy business. B-

“Besides a Dinosaur, Whatta Ya Wanna Be When You Grow Up?” by Ray Bradbury. Bradbury, of course, was a big name to score for any anthology — big enough that he skated into The Ultimate Dinosaur with its only reprint, a story originally published in 1983. It’s exactly as Bradburyan as you’d expect: Midwestern fabulism rooted in an idyll of white middle class 20th century childhood, full of the tender-sweet bruises of loss and that childhood summer night feeling that nothing is in your control. B+

“Unnatural Enemy” by Poul Anderson. Rote “nature red in tooth and claw” stuff, nothing especially interesting. In typically Andersonian fashion, this story grunts and throbs with masculine fantasies of mating season, of battling other males, the victor rutting as he pleases. (Even here in the Late Cretaceous seas, every named character is male.) It could almost be one of Anderson’s turgid Viking fantasies. I will note that this was my first exposure to fiction told from the perspective of prehistoric animals, pre-dating my first read of Raptor Red by a couple years. Raptor Red is a feminist masterpiece in comparison. D-

“Dawn of the Endless Night” by Harry Harrison. Standard stuff about intelligent, society-building reptiles struck down by the terminal Cretaceous asteroid. Nothing much to note beyond that, aside from my distaste for the old trope of “this alien society was biologically engineered into its hierarchy.” At least it’s a step up from the previous story. C-

“The Green Buffalo” by Harry Turtledove. Closing out with the de rigueur tale of a living dinosaur in the Wild West. Of course Cope and Marsh are involved. More indirectly than they were in Sharon N. Farber’s “The Last Thunder Horse West of the Mississippi” (read and reviewed here), but still, this is basically the same story, retreading the same plot with less panache four years later. The way Joe and the other hunters pass from dusty 19th century Wyoming into the verdant Cretaceous found its way into a lot of my teenage time-slip writing, though. C

And that’s it for the stories! Overall, about what I expected. I’ve carted this copy with me through many moves over the last two decades — it still has the sticker from the used bookstore where I purchased it in 2003. It feels weird to have revisited it at long last. Nostalgic, of course, but also the usual icky feeling stirred by so much of ’90s sci-fi. I’m definitely carting it along with me in future moves, too, though who knows if I’ll ever read it again. Maybe I’ll revisit “Herding with the Hadrosaurs” again in a few years.

Monday, June 19, 2023

2023 read #69: The Rise and Reign of the Mammals by Steve Brusatte.

The Rise and Reign of the Mammals: A New History, From the Shadow of the Dinosaurs to Us by Steve Brusatte
Illustrations by Todd Marshall and Sarah Shelley
484 pages
Published 2022
Read from June 8 to June 19
Rating: 3 out of 5

I’ve been wary of this book ever since I read Brusatte’s disappointing The Rise and Fall of the Dinosaurs. One person I know found this book mediocre, and encouraged me to read Riley Black’s The Last Days of the Dinosaurs instead. However, there just haven’t been enough books about the evolutionary radiation of mammals — there’s no way I wouldn’t have picked up this book eventually.

Thankfully, the breezy, almost flippant “these aren’t your dad’s dinosaurs” style that made me roll my eyes at Brusatte’s Rise and Fall is somewhat more subdued here, making for blander but less patronizing prose. (That said, I need Brusatte to stop referring to DNA phylogenetic reconstructions as a “paternity test.”) Not even at its best, however, does this book compare to Elsa Panciroli’s excellent Beasts Before UsBrusatte maxes out at a serviceable level of pop science journalism, and presents a greatest-hits skim through synapsid history rather than any cohesive, ecosystem-centered overview. He consigns much space to pocket biographies of paleontologists while skimming over vast subject areas — whole eras of life — in just a few pages.

That’s the kind of pop science that sells, I suppose. The public loves to read about personalities; no science book, sadly, is complete without various eccentric scientists. But where Panciroli doesn’t hesitate to call out scientists of the past for their horrendous beliefs and practices — I’m looking at you, Robert Broom — Brusatte maintains the polite veneer of older pop science books. He simply doesn’t talk about it. He does that whole “We just don’t discuss politics with Grandpa” act, thereby sweeping the white supremacist foundations of Western science under the rug.

I was pleased to find that Mammals is a hefty volume; despite the modern taste for human interest anecdotes, there was still room for a modicum of actual science to enjoy in this pop science book. Much of said information is relegated to the endnotes, of course, but it’s nice to have nonetheless. (Brusatte even uses the endnotes to acknowledge a little bit of Robert Broom’s shittiness.) If only more of it had filtered into the text!

Tuesday, May 16, 2023

2023 read #53: Oak and Ash and Thorn by Peter Fiennes.

Oak and Ash and Thorn: The Ancient Woods and New Forests of Britain by Peter Fiennes
280 pages
Published 2017
Read from May 15 to May 16
Rating: 4 out of 5

By the close of the ’00s, at the latest, it had become depressing to read ecological books from the 1990s and earlier. After a litany of losses and dire warnings for the future, such books would always close on a note of optimism — there’s still time! The worst has not yet come to pass! We just need to act now!

Living in a time when worse things have (and continued to) come to pass, we know all those optimistic codas added up to an exercise in comforting self-delusion. Capitalism would never be diverted from its consumption, its heedless self-absorption, its global destruction. No one with any real power ever acted to help. We’re all going down with the ship.

The pace of destruction, in fact, has worsened to the point that, today, even a book from 2017 feels hopelessly dated and woefully optimistic. Fiennes withholds no contempt from Britain’s Conservative government, and yet within the space of six years from this publication the Tories would unleash fresh ecological devastation and capitalistic horrors beyond anything documented here. They’re close to axing all environmental protections. Every day ancient woodlands fall, and now sewage is getting released untreated into Britain’s waterways, because deregulation, because Brexit, because capitalism. We’ve regressed to the days of industrial barons exploiting and poisoning the people and the countryside without any pretense of public safeguards. It’s a jarring reminder of the accelerating growth of fascism here in the “find out” phase of capitalism’s fuck around history.

Fascism is always the last bulwark of defense for capitalist systems in decline; now the entire world is in decline. “The authorities don’t like forests,” Fiennes writes in a chapter that began with Robin Hood, “because they don’t like places where people can hide.” Yet another layer in the long history of authoritarianism and its antipathy toward the world. Is it any wonder that capital never stepped up to curb the devastation it wreaked?

I’ve wanted to read this book since I first heard of it late in 2018. Since then, so much has changed… so much in the world has broken. I cried a few times reading this, wondering how much of the already impoverished and paved-over island ecosystem Fiennes described has been further destroyed. The very ash trees of the title, already dying when he wrote, are nearly gone.

Fiennes’ writing is often more conversational than poetic, rambling almost stream-of-consciousness through locations, literary quotations, concepts, asides. It’s no match for Helen Macdonald or Robert Macfarlane at their best, but whose prose is? I don’t want to give the wrong impression, though: this book is not lacking for beauty. The chapter where he condenses 7018 years of woodland history into 3509 words — two years for every word — is a marvel of wordcraft and structuring, offering evocative yet concise descriptions of the bygone wildwood, “a kingdom of trees” where people are outnumbered by wolves as recently as the Neolithic, and its accelerating diminution and destruction. Fiennes also excels at conveying details of atmosphere and at character sketches, the places and people from childhood rendered with a palpable sense of what has been lost, both natural and personal.

Really, this is a book of mourning more than it is a celebration of what remains or a sermon for its preservation. A note of “it’s too late, enjoy what life you can” pervades just beneath its pages. And perhaps that’s more honest, less willfully naïve, than the ecological optimism that came before it. If the powers-that-be are heedless, well… we’ll have to make them heed, any way we can, or else we all perish.

Wednesday, March 29, 2023

2023 read #33: My Beloved Brontosaurus by Riley Black.

My Beloved Brontosaurus: On the Road with Old Bones, New Science, and Our Favorite Dinosaurs by Riley Black
241 pages
Published 2013
Read from March 25 to March 29
Rating: 3 out of 5

A pretty conventional “dinosaurs aren’t like what they used to be!” pop science book, largely along the same lines as Steve Brusatte’s The Rise and Fall of the Dinosaurs. While Black’s writing is in casual pop science mode here, and not trying to do anything fancy, it has a slight edge edge over Brusatte’s here’s-one-for-the-normies prose. Brontosaurus feels more informative and confident in the cognitive abilities of its audience, overall. There are chapters on dinosaur diseases and parasites, for example, rather than “here’s a whole chapter about T. rex!”

However, science often moves fast; ten years after publication, My Beloved Brontosaurus feels juuuust out of date enough to make me question if it was worth reading. The title itself, for example—a reference to how the genus Brontosaurus was subsumed into Apatosaurus, a metaphor to encapsulate the gulf between pop culture perceptions and ever-evolving dino science, the way that childhood’s kitschy dinosaurs were erased by refined understandingwas rendered obsolete in 2015, when a new study suggested that Brontosaurus was likely its own distinct, valid genus after all. (In all fairness to Black, she does mention a “rumor” of the then-ongoing study in the epilogue.)

Painless but inessential, that’s the vibe I’ll give it. And it’s about dinosaurs, so that always gets a generous rating from me.

Monday, February 13, 2023

2023 read #19: The Last Days of the Dinosaurs by Riley Black.

The Last Days of the Dinosaurs: An Asteroid, Extinction, and the Beginning of Our World by Riley Black
293 pages
Published 2022
Read from February 10 to February 13
Rating: 3.5 out of 5

The extinction of the dinosaurs is, to me, far and away the least interesting thing about them. That's why I avoided this book last year, when I was speeding through the likes of Beasts Before Us and Otherlands. When I learned that this book devoted much of its length to what happened in the aftermath of Chicxulub, however, I had to get my hands on it. Not nearly enough books deal with the scraggly process of ecological recovery and strange new mammalian evolution in the Paleocene.

Unexpectedly, the bulk of The Last Days is told in a speculative, dino’s-eye-view style, placing it closer in tone and vibe to Raptor Red than I anticipated. Black’s prose is what I’d consider middling pop science journalism—an improvement over Steve Brusatte’s The Rise and Fall of the Dinosaurs, but not nearly as poetic and evocative as Thomas Halliday’s Otherlands. Black’s best writing is also her most personal and vulnerable, exploring the parallels between the K-Pg extinction and her own personal transitions. As someone writing my own chapbook on the themes of paleontology, gender, and personal prehistories, I wish more of The Last Days had that same depth.

Thursday, October 20, 2022

2022 read #44: The Rise and Fall of the Dinosaurs by Steve Brusatte.

The Rise and Fall of the Dinosaurs: A New History of Their Lost World by Steve Brusatte
398 pages
Published 2018
Read from October 18 to October 20
Rating: 3 out of 5

Ah, 2018. Now that's a lost world. I remember strolling around Barnes & Noble, blissfully unaware of the potential civilization-killing pandemic then barely more than a year away, and stopping dead in my tracks when I saw this book on display. It had been a long time since the big Dinomania boom of the 1990s. Not many pop-science dinosaur books had been published since then, let alone aggressively promoted into bestsellerdom. I couldn't afford retail price books back then (and I really can't now, though I have enough wiggle room these days to go on the occasional discounted or used book splurge), but I came close to springing for this one.

I didn't, of course. And it's probably for the best that I didn't. I liked this book fine enough, I suppose, but I'm not its intended audience, and that dulled my enjoyment. Unlike later books that publishers snatched up to cash in on success of Rise and Fall -- titles like Beasts Before Us and Otherlands, two books I enjoyed tremendously -- this book doesn't trust its readers with grasping its subject. Rise is explicitly, perhaps even cynically, written for mass consumption, its ideal audience the sort of blandly curious reader who has somehow never touched a book on geology or evolution (or dinosaurs) since middle school. As popular science books go, it feels like a naked grab at bestsellerdom. And apparently it worked.

Like so many popular science titles these days, Rise spends much of its time giving pocket biographies of the cool characters of modern paleontology, all of whom happen to be great buddies of Brusatte's. Publishers love that "human interest" element, I suppose. The presentation of the actual science is hopelessly glib, employing banalities like "This was the real Jurassic Park" and shortening foraminafera to "forams" without ever giving the accepted (and not even that difficult) name. In a book already choked for space thanks to all the bios of Brusatte's rad buddies, there's an entire chapter on Tyrannosaurus rex. If you came for a new history of the dinosaurs' lost world, as I did, you'd be disappointed. If you were a casual reader who didn't know a thing about dinosaurs beyond the name T. rex, this would be the book for you.

More than anything, it feels like Brusatte used this book to position himself as our generation's go-to media paleontologist. The Millennial equivalent of Bob Bakker or John Horner: that one guy the newspapers know the name of and call up whenever they need a flavor quote, or that one guy who's the token expert in any documentary. If that was his goal, it seems to have succeeded admirably.