Wednesday, June 28, 2023

2023 read #73: Weird Woods: Tales from the Haunted Forests of Britain, edited by John Miller.

Weird Woods: Tales from the Haunted Forests of Britain, edited by John Miller
238 pages
Published 2020
Read from June 23 to June 28
Rating: 2 out of 5

I never lost my taste for reading weird old nuggets of fantasy from bygone eras. I picked this book up from a horror-centric bookshop relatively recently, excited mainly about the “weird woods” conceit but also about the years these stories were published. It's true that I haven’t been reading many anthologies like this, though. Finishing Masterpieces of Fantasy and Enchantment (at long last) left me with a heightened craving for musty old fantasy, on top of my standard level of interest, so this seems like a good time to start this one.

Oh, Britain and its woods. Devouring Sherlock Holmes books at an impressionable age left me with lifelong anglophilia. Learning about the horrors of English colonialism and racism in my teens and adulthood narrowed my love of things British to the archipelago’s scenery and natural environment, nurtured by the writings of Helen Macdonald, Robert Macfarlane, and Roger Deakin. (Or, more recently, Peter Fiennes.) But even my appreciation for rolling green fields and remnants of the ancient wood has been rotted by the contemporary UK’s headlong rush into fascism, environmental destruction, and bigotry. I love the wildwood, the Neolithic wood, the primordial wood, the fairy wood, and I always will — but I don’t like England all that much right now.

“The Whisper in the Wood” by Anon (1880). This was originally published in All the Year Round, one of those journals from the heyday of short fiction readership, albeit one that kept its contributors strictly anonymous. (Maybe its founder, Charles Dickens, didn’t want to share the limelight?) We might tactfully describe this story’s prose as unsophisticated: “‘Why, it is not a fortnight ago since he gave [his will] to me, poor old fellow!’ and, as the excitement of the explanation he has given subsides, his blue eyes moisten.” The plot is rote and the characters essentially made of cardboard. Still, there’s a certain naïve charm to be found, if you can indulge the Victorian taste for categorizing harmless woodland creatures like foxes and snakes as “objects in a nightmare,” and I have no complaints about the story’s moorland setting (though it takes half the yarn to get us there). Ultimately a silly, insubstantial gothic adventure, but I emerged unscathed.

“Man-Size in Marble” by Edith Nesbit (1887). This tale is mostly vibes. Newlyweds find an oddly cheap cottage near a wood and a church, and spend three months in Arcadian bliss before All Hallow’s Eve comes along and the marble effigies of two Catholic marauders (the most Victorian thing to fear) reanimate in the chancel. This story’s strengths lie in its bucolic descriptions and the (for its time) sweet depiction of wedded happiness. The supernatural horror element is little more than a shrug.

“The Striding Place” by Gertrude Atherton (1896). I couldn’t muster up much enthusiasm for this brief sketch of a sporting aristocrat who muses on the disappearance of his bosom friend (also a sporting aristocrat) as he walks through the woods, his steps inadvertently directing him to the spot that claimed his friend. Ends with a campfire story jump-scare.

“The Man Who Went Too Far” by E. F. Benson (1904). While it carries a whiff of Edwardian mustiness, this tale of man seeking apotheosis from Pan in a Hampshire wood crackles just beneath the surface with queer eroticism and animistic sensitivity. The denouement isn’t much of anything, as seems typical of this time, but it’s the best story here so far.

“An Old Thorn” by W. H. Hudson (1911). I’m indifferent about this one, a tale of a tree’s slow revenge and the tragedy of the English court system. It’s a nested series of framing devices: the narrator is trying to learn about an old hawthorn all alone on a hill, which he describes at length; he finally pries out a tale about a laborer hung for poaching, and in the middle of that tale goes into an extended flashback about the laborer’s childhood and ardent young love, showing how he inadvertently earned the tree’s ire and didn’t beg forgiveness in time. A nested structure of flashbacks can work sometimes, but it feels ramshackle here. Also, in the throes of his love, our laborer refers to his new wife’s “breasties,” which — while boldly sensual for 1911 — might be the most unappealing term I’ve read in some time.

“The White Lady of Rownam Avenue, Near Stirling” by Elliott O’Donnell (1911). A “true” ghost story from the pre-war heyday of ghost obsession. (I almost said the final heyday of Spiritualism, which would have made for a better sentence, but apparently O’Donnell claimed not to be a Spiritualist, merely a self-appointed expert on the supernatural.) Brief, unremarkable; it feels questionable to include it in an anthology of weird woods tales.

“Ancient Lights” by Algernon Blackwood (1914). Now this is more like it. There’s a wood, and it’s weird, and it certainly doesn’t want some surveyors’ clerk eyeing it for destruction in order to clear the view from someone’s dining room window. This wouldn’t appear on any all-time-greats list, but this is exactly the sort of story I’d want in a collection like this. Plus, it’s good to see we’re in a more contemporary era of storytelling at last. Not a single framing device or appeal to the reader’s belief — just a character introduced in the middle of his business, and what befalls him afterward. However, the twist at the end didn’t really feel like a twist so much as a punchline to a Goosebumps book. (Spoilers: the note which says “use the shortcut if you care to” seems to read “use the shortcut if you dare to”!!)

“The Name-Tree” by Mary Webb (1921). I haven’t read much stream-of-consciousness prose. Heck, I haven’t read enough to even say for certain that this piece is written in a stream-of-consciousness style. I can say it’s a short, ugly story about a woman passionately protective of a cherry grove (in which her name-tree grows), and the rich new landowner who strains to impose his crude sexual will upon her with bribes and blackmail. We drift from her perspective into his, one scene jumbled with the next, with a whole lotta innuendo about flowers and ripening fruit, and then it ends with an inadvertently comic turn of modernist abruptness. Groundbreaking and important at the time, I’m sure — a necessary but awkward step in the evolution of both feminist and modernist literature. I didn’t really enjoy it, though.

“The Tree” by Walter de la Mare (1922). A rigidly insular fruit merchant, unable to conceptualize anything unrelated to making money, fumes and fulminates at his artistic half-brother’s infatuation with an exotic tree slowly transforming the latter's garden and life. It’s an unsubtle metaphor for how imperialism brings change to the “home country,” told from the perspective of one of the stuffy and unimaginatively commerce-minded cogs of empire, his face purple with indignation and high blood pressure. This story is, if nothing else, determined to be descriptive. At times it successfully transcends descriptive to become atmospheric, almost in spite of itself: “A half-empty jam-pot buzzing with bees was no more appetising an object because the insects were not of the usual variety.” It’s far too long for what it is, though.

“‘He Made a Woman—’” by Marjorie Bowen (1923). Modern man Charnock — unsettled by a surfeit of civilization, no longer sure what reality might be — wants a vacation to avoid a thoroughly modern attack of nerves. He reluctantly accompanies his old tutor Blantyre into Wales, knowing that the history-laden landscape won’t soothe his modern mind. Most vexing to his search for true himbo serenity: there’s a young woman in the house! And Blantyre tells Charnock not to fall in love with her! This brief tale succeeds at conveying an atmosphere, though little else. I’ll be honest, I couldn’t stop thinking of the Futurama episode in which the moon farmer warns Bender, “Don’t you be touchin’ my robot daughters!”

“A Neighbour’s Landmark” by M. R. James (1924). A deliberate stylistic throwback — there’s even an interjection chiding the primary storyteller about his Victorian manner — which works better than most actual Victorian stories. It’s a fairly conventional ghost story (a curse bound to a wrongfully moved property boundary or something like that) that sustains a nice flow almost until the end, where the narrative just… peters out. That seems to be a common complaint with this anthology.

“N” by Arthur Machen (1936). As someone who grew up a city kid, I’ve always been drawn to the trope that a city can contain anything, that the next neighborhood over — or where the sidewalk ends — might be a realm of mystery and strangeness, a land as mythically remote as the wildwood. I’m partially certain (though I’m not invested enough to verify it) that Peter Ackroyd may have quoted this very story to illustrate that magical urbanism vibe in his London: The Biography. I liked the general outline of this one more than I enjoyed the story itself, which — despite being a contemporary of Unknown and thus the first recognizable iteration of urban fantasy fiction — eschews stakes or rising action. Machen putters in a desultory way from old-timers reminiscing about old times, to antiquarian musings on alchemy and reclaiming the lost, pre-Edenic malleability of reality, and on back to a different set of old-timers conversing in a tavern. Machen’s primary interest here appears to be the art of reproducing rambly conversations between older men. All of which is a roundabout path to not much in particular. Only the last page hints at the story this could have been, had Machen been inclined to tell it instead of what we got.

And that’s it! All in all, a shade disappointing, given the anthology’s promising title and evocative cover art. Could have used more woods and much more weird. Still, I enjoyed myself.

Thursday, June 22, 2023

2023 read #72: Masterpieces of Fantasy and Enchantment, compiled by David G. Hartwell and Kathryn Cramer.

Masterpieces of Fantasy and Enchantment, compiled by David G. Hartwell and Kathryn Cramer
628 pages
Published 1988
Read from January 1, 2016 to June 22, 2023
Rating: 2.5 out of 5

First, a preamble from here in 2023: I started reading this book a long ass time ago. Seven and a half years, in fact, or approximately three subjective lifetimes ago — before Trumpism, before I got into a relationship that proved shitty, before I made the mistake of moving to Ohio, before I moved again to the Piedmont. I was still reading it when Trump “won” the 2016 election. I was picking away at it in the rural Ohio trailer home where I lived in early 2019. I got rid of my original copy at some point in all the moves, remembered I never finished it, found another copy for cheap on eBay, and here we are. I won’t start over, but I will finish the damn thing this time. Luckily I wrote reviews for each story as I went along, and saved it in my drafts.

Here’s my original preamble from way back in January 2016:

Way back in 2014, I think it was, I went through a binge of buying up fantasy and science fiction anthologies whenever I could find them. Modern Classics of Fantasy inspired this splurge: the historical cross-section of classic fantasy stories, from 1938 all the way through to the mid-1990s, was exactly what I had always wanted without ever knowing it, and that volume left me craving more. Unfortunately, while sci-fi has an extensive and well-curated catalog of best-ofs and annual anthologies dating back into the 1960s, fantasy seems to have been largely a backwater genre until the very close of the 1970s — or, at any rate, it seems much more difficult to obtain a good selection of short fantasy fiction before the New Romantic era. This current volume is one of the very few exclusively fantasy compilations which takes the historical approach, and was one of the first I ordered in that spending spree. But I kept putting off the reading part of the transaction, partly because my reading record and attention span was so scant last year. I'm hoping to do better this year. [Spoiler: I did not do better.]

A glance through the contents shows some familiar tales, some exciting names, and some antiquarian relics that could prove either fascinating or tremendously dull. My plan is to read it a story or two at a time, in between other works, so I don't get bogged down in a boring stretch and can maintain my reading momentum. [Spoiler: I did not stick with this plan.]

“The Rule of Names” by Ursula K. Le Guin (1964). This charming, bucolic little fable is an early glimpse into what would become Earthsea, published four years before A Wizard of Earthsea. It is pleasant but predictable for the most part, perhaps a bit too condensed and just-so for my tastes, but ends on a satisfying note of horror and bloodshed to come. I kind of regret rushing through the Earthsea novels back in 2013; I think the world Le Guin created is best explored at leisure, with time to reflect upon and appreciate its small revelations.

“The Magic Fishbone” by Charles Dickens (1867). The subtitle — “Romance. From the Pen of Miss Alice Rainbird.* (*Aged seven.)” — gives an accurate forecast of the amount of preciousness globbed and slathered all over this little fairy tale. In Miss Alice’s putative tale, the industrious and worthy Princess Alicia labors to hold her family and household together as her mother the Queen falls ill, the cook runs off with a drunk soldier, and her father King Watkins the First struggles against penury and a quarterly pay schedule at the distant Office. In classic Dickensian fashion, all the superficial whimsy serves to illustrate the awful living conditions and financial stresses of the Victorian working class. I liked it rather more than I had expected to. Certain lines (e.g., “Prince Certainpersonio was sitting by himself, eating barley-sugar and waiting to be ninety”) reminded me of the appeal of Catherynne M. Valente’s early Fairyland books (which is getting the chronology all reversed, but no matter — you know what I mean).

“The Goddess on the Street Corner” by Margaret St. Clair (1953). A beautiful, delicately heartbreaking vignette about a down-and-out alcoholic struggling to nurse an even more down-and-out Aphrodite. A solid entry.

“Feathertop: A Moralized Legend” by Nathaniel Hawthorne (1852). A quaint and charmingly innocent allegory of a scarecrow given life on the whim of a New England witch and sent out into the wide world of “coxcombs and charlatans... made up of just such a jumble of worn-out, forgotten, and good-for-nothing trash as he was” — only to encounter the tragedy of seeing himself for what he really is. Fortuitous timing, reading this so soon after an extended primer on New England witchcraft.

“The Root and the Ring” by Wyman Guin (1954). Except for a certain Leave It to Beaver-esque reek to the family and workplace dynamics, this is a startlingly modern story of math, magic, and insecurity — and even the white-bread family dynamic gets a little tweak as the magic of the mathematical ring works its way up from the roots of the backyard apple tree: “[The boy] had a bunch of ‘art-photo’ and ‘girlie’ magazines scattered across his desk. The blonde nude he had before him hit me right in the midriff, but he sat there, calm as a cucumber, measuring the distance from her navel to her chin with calipers.” The man-is-the-head-of-the-household business soured the ending; otherwise this was an excellent (and humorous) mood piece.

“The Green Magician” by L. Sprague de Camp and Fletcher Pratt (1953). I’ve mentioned somewhere before, in one of these short story anthology reviews, how unsatisfying it can be to land upon a serial adventure story that comes at the end of a long and built-up sequence of canon. The first two pages here are spent getting us up to speed with what I assume are our hero Harold Shea’s most recent published exploits, rather like some breathless radio show announcer's table-setting spiel for the benefit of first-time listeners. The general conceit of a guy traveling from magical world to magical world, figuring out the laws of magic in each realm in order to escape to the next adventure, accompanied by a wife acquired in The Faery Queen and a detective straight out of a pulp magazine, is definitively (and appealingly) de Camp (and Pratt for all I know). Indeed, after the shaky start, this becomes a crackerjack (if rather long) pulp adventure, with scheming druids, a quick trip to the land of the Sidhe, and (perhaps inevitably, given de Camp’s paleo proclivities) a battle with an Irish relative of the Loch Ness Monster.

“Our Fair City” by Robert A. Heinlein (1948). A charming little urban fantasy pulper about a sentient whirlwind, a cynical reporter, dirty cops, and a corrupt city administration. Entertaining, albeit a tad too pat and shallow.

“The Man Who Could Not See Devils” by Joanna Russ (1970). After the forgettable fluff of “Nobody's Home” (read and reviewed here) and the bold mess of The Female Man, I'm as surprised as anyone to find a Joanna Russ story I dig without reservations. I did not experience the concluding "jolt of wonder" Hartwell (or Cramer) promised in his introduction to this tale — the ending felt, if anything, obvious from the first page — but that didn't lessen my liking for the story as a whole.

“Hieroglyphic Tales” by Horace Walpole (1785). I knew nothing of Walpole before reading Hartwell's introduction here, which sent me on a Google hunt that only intrigues me more. Writer, apparently, of the first Gothic novel (The Castle of Otranto), Walpole in these seven “Tales” (only seven copies of which were printed in his lifetime, none of them escaping his possession) concocts surreal fables reminiscent of Swift's absurdist allegories, without Swift's satirical bite. Occasionally there are glimpses of otherworldly opulence and voluptuous mysticism presaging Catherynne M. Valente's Dirge for Prester John novels, such as the luxurious opening of “The Bird’s Nest,” but such moments of transcendence are rare. The “Tales” are more interesting within their historical context as precocious efforts at surreal fiction than as stories per se. I'm glad I read them, but they had the feel of a coursework assignment, rather than something I'd ever seek out for my own enjoyment.

“Bird of Prey” by John Collier (1941). A brief sketch of insidious doubt and poisonous jealousy. Too succinct to have much of an impact; had this been drawn out longer, the characters given more substance, I think it would have been a good example of psychological horror.

“The Detective of Dreams” by Gene Wolfe (1980). Clever supernatural detective story in the atmospheric mode of Poe, rich with character and sense of place despite its relative brevity, with an unexpected but (in retrospect) apposite conclusion.

“The Bee-man of Orn” by Frank R. Stockton (1887). I'm not sure whether to categorize this as a just-so story, a shaggy dog story, or a fable. Sweet, charming, wryly humorous — a delightful little tale.

“The Red Hawk” by Elizabeth A. Lynn (1983). A charming mythopoeic tale of a dutiful astronomer entrusted with command of the winds, the bored trickster god who beguiles her, and the twin girls born to them. It reminded me foremost of the better stories to be found in Lin Carter's Year's Best Fantasy anthologies — it carries within it something of that 1970s mythic fantasy tradition, reminiscent of C. J. Cherryh's mythological fairy tale “The Dark King” from 1979 (reviewed here), perhaps unsurprising given its close chronological proximity. Yet it also felt a bit more modern, perhaps reminding me of the godlings in N. K. Jemisin's Inheritance Trilogy. This isn't an all time classic, but it's a promising first exposure to the work of Lynn, whose Chronicles of Tornor trilogy has been on my to-read list for some time now. [Note from 2023: Years after writing this, I finally read Lynn’s Watchtower.]

“The Canvasser’s Tale” by Mark Twain (1876). I read this long ago, in a purportedly complete edition of Twain's short works, and even after the passage of almost two decades, the text was familiar. Familiarity does not breed monotony in this case; indeed, Twain's humorous inflections and ironic sensibilities probably make more sense to me now than they did in my teens. I was amused by it then, and cannot be any less amused by it now.

Here we are now, mid-November [2016]; the election has happened, spray-tan fascism is poised to take over Washington, and the optimistic New Year's Day when I began this book feels quite far off. After all these months, I'm not even half done with this volume. Nihilistic thoughts hang over me. Yet finish this book this year I shall — which means actually sitting down to read the damn thing. [Note: I did no such thing.]

“The Silken-swift...” by Theodore Sturgeon (1953). And what should be the first tale I read from this tome in this brave new world? A prettily written morality play of a spiteful, man-hating temptress who so arouses and tantalizes some poor fellow that he goes out and, in his witchery-induced blindness, rapes an innocent girl, thinking her to be the very “devil” who tormented him. “There has never been a woman so foul,” he hisses at the temptress, after discovering the mistaken identity — as if he had no control over his own actions. In the end, when the unicorn arrives and chooses the violated girl over the (still virginal) temptress, I think it was intended to be something of a progressive, subversive statement for the time — literal virginity is not to be valued over purity of spirit — but now, of all times, this tale hits a sour note. I can't bring myself to feel much more than distaste for this story.

“The New Mother” by Lucy Clifford (1882, or possibly earlier). This, by contrast, is delightful — a strange fairy tale that, aside from some distinct Victorian moral overtones that no steampunk throwback could quite match, feels as if it could have been published in an anthology sometime in the last couple decades.

“Mr. Lupescu” by Anthony Boucher (1945). I'm not sure how to describe this little slip of a narrative without spoiling it entirely, so here's a warning: I'm spoiling it entirely. A boy thinks a little demon man is his playmate, but it turns out to be his mother's former suitor, who convinces the boy to shoot his negligent father — all very eye-rolling and obvious stuff, even if it pre-dates the 1980s (when this sort of thing really flourished) by some thirty-five years. But then, in the final stinger, it turns out there is some sort of demonic presence involved — and it's coming for the suitor. That last bit also feels totally '80s, but it helped elevate this tale (slightly) from mediocrity (however precocious that mediocrity might be).

“The King of the Cats” by Stephen Vincent Benét (1929). Kind of unremarkable relocation of a fairy tale to the dining rooms of New York high society; the strain of social satire praised in the introduction to this story was lost on me.

“Uncle Einar” by Ray Bradbury (1947). A precious little fancy about a winged man despondent about being grounded. Slight but sweet.

“Space-Time for Springers” by Fritz Leiber (1958). Read and reviewed in Modern Classics of Fantasy. There I called it “a character study at turns hilarious and strangely affecting.”

“Great Is Diana” by Avram Davidson (1958). Yet another “ancient myths intrude upon the modern world” tale, one which by no means can compare to “The Goddess on the Street Corner” in this selfsame volume. I normally dig Davidson stories, but the framing device he employs here — a few bluff old pals sharing cocktails away from the womenfolk — diminishes to the point of nonexistence any impact the tale might have had, reducing it to an anecdotal punchline about polymastia and breast fetishism. Which is, likely, the point. A weak effort overall.

“The Last of the Huggermuggers: A Giant Story” by Christopher Pearse Cranch (1855). Hartwell (or Cramer) goes to some length setting up this tale as a lost classic, languishing in its undeserved obscurity, reporting almost breathlessly, “This is the first time in a century that ‘The Last of the Huggermuggers’ has been reprinted.” The story is adequate enough, I suppose — obviously a children-friendly reprise of Gulliver among the Brobdingnagians, with a plucky young American adventure-seeker as its hero — but the editors’ excitement at bringing it back into print seems a little bit excessive.

“Tobermory” by Saki (1909). Mildly amusing little comedy of manners arising when a talking cat offers most unmannerly observations it has gleaned from its household’s social and sexual peccadilloes.

“The King of the Elves” by Philip K. Dick (1953). This is, to my recollection, my first out-and-out fantasy story from Dick, and it's more or less exactly what one would expect. Shadrach Jones, who runs a gas station in a town forgotten by the highway, becomes King of the Elves one rainy night, and must lead their armies against the destructive advance of the Trolls — or has his brain merely been disordered by escapist urges and the frustrations and loneliness of his quotidian life? Dick doesn't sustain that note of ambiguity for long, but this remains a charming little number, well worth a read.

Four “American Fairy Tales” by L. Frank Baum (1901). I haven't read anything of Baum’s beyond the original Wizard of Oz, and that I read well over two decades ago. So these four tales (selections from a larger work, which contained twelve “American Fairy Tales” all told) were a welcome delight. They are, of course, a bit on the old-fashioned-moralizing side, but they're breezy and amusing, far more so than many of the older stories in this volume. The world could do well with more sorcerers on the top floors of tenements and high-kicking professors in the thrall of magical bonbons.

Here’s where I left off, once again, two-thirds of the way through, in April or May 2019. Little did I know that a year and a half later my original copy would be sold for pennies to a used bookstore and I’d be once again starting my life over from scratch. Ah well.

There this review remained in my drafts until a stubborn completionist streak caught up with me in June 2023 and convinced me to obtain another cheap copy and resume right where I left off. 

“The Tale of Dragons and Dreamers” by Samuel R. Delany (1979). One of the first books I ever bought in my first flush of disposable income, age 19, was Delany’s Dhalgren. I carted that copy with me through sixteen years and six moves and never managed to get beyond the first page. Eventually I conceded and gave it away to a thrift store. Clearly, Delany’s dense, oblique style, redolent of 20th century philosophy treatises, never clicked with me, no matter how much I’ve wanted it to. I’m pretty sure this story is the reason why I never finished this book in 2019, funnily enough. It is one of the titular tales from Tales of Nevèrÿon (another Delany book I bought at one point, never read, and discarded). There’s something about Delany’s refusal to play along with fantasy’s central tradition of artifice, making no attempt to suspend your disbelief — the way his characters openly discuss the metaphorical meanings and uses of dragons, or the economic ripple effects of barbarians freeing slaves, in between vast expository dumps of dialogue — that takes some adjustment. This is sociology behind a construction-paper mask that says “fantasy” on it. Telling a mere story seems Delany’s second priority, well behind dissecting social mores of race, aristocracy, slavery, power, sex, and the way these constructs condition our behavior. That said, it isn’t all dry social commentary: when Delany’s prose hits, it hits. In the end, this — the story that stymied me in the past, by the author I’ve just never been able to get into — proved to be one of the best in this collection. (Not that I can say I remember a damn thing about any of the stories I read all those years ago. Oh well.)

Excerpt from Phantasmion by Sara Coleridge (1837). The opening chapters of what the editors call “The first novel set in fairyland in the English language.” Perhaps unsurprisingly, these chapters sketch the title character’s quick turn from joyful childhood to an adolescence beset by mortality, as mother, childhood friend, father, and young adult companion all perish in turn around him, causing him to seek the aid promised to him by the fairy Potentilla, queen of the insect realm. Her gift of wings just happens to carry him to a crash-landing on a beach where he just happens to overhear two fairy women plotting against one even more beautiful, whom he had just happened to see in a vision before he crashed, etc. So Phantasmion returns to Potentilla and asks her for the wall-walking abilities of a fly. Thoroughly of its time, at least from what I can tell here.

“The Sapphire Necklace” (1930), “The Regent of the North” (1915), and “The Eyeless Dragons: A Chinese Story” (1915) by Kenneth Morris. Also of their time: these three pieces. They have a modernist flavor reminiscent of Olaf Stapledon, mixing myth with the newly understood grandeur of the scientific cosmos. The entire universe in “Necklace,” for example, is a vast mountainous country where stars are the various regents and princes of constellations, a planet is little more than a dim hideaway with a cellar for a jewel-thieving god named Ghuggg, and King Arthur and Taliesin get involved in retrieving the jewelry, riding their war-steeds across space. “Necklace” is the best by far of the three. “Regent,” sadly, dredges up masculine fantasies of Viking manly men, “honorable and vigorous,” abandoning the newly effete world of Christian Sweden for the vast beautiful cruelties of the mythical North (never a good vibe when you look back upon this particular era). “Dragons” is definitively Orientalist but, perhaps, is less egregious than one might fear, though as a moralistic fable it feels a tad ham-handed and predictable.

“Elric at the End of Time” by Michael Moorcock (1981). I thought I’d read (and despised) an Elric story in the past, but it turns out that I had Moorcock mixed up with Stephen R. Donaldson. Unfortunately, Moorcock’s Elric seems to draw from the same grim and gritty antihero aesthetic I associate with Donaldson’s writing, so it works out much the same in the end. This is an overlong mess of time travel, intersecting planes, demon bargains, a sentient sword fed by blood — the usual testosterone-fantasy glurge. Worst of all, it spills into wacky fish-out-of-water shenanigans as Elric tumbles into a nest of immortal aesthetes, runs afoul of the bureaucracy of time travel, and compares the relative doom-ladenness of their respective doom-laden destinies with the Last Romantic. Still, this was better than the one Donaldson story I’ve read (“Reave the Just” in the After the King anthology). Definitely not something I’d seek out again, but hey, it could have been worse?

“Lindenborg Pool” by William Morris (1856). I know William Morris for his textile and wallpaper designs, so I was surprised to learn his antiquarian bent had contributed much to the early evolution of English fantasy, as well. This might be the most Victorian thing (derogatory) I’ve ever read. We begin, of course, with the necessity of a framing device to beg the reader’s indulgence — basically “I read some Norse mythology and got inspired and wrote this through the night, hope you don’t mind!” Next, our narrator is afflicted with “cold, chill horror” at the sight of what sounds to modern ears like a quite pleasant spring-fed pool in the moors. Then, naturally, we transition into the old Oh good heavens, what’s this? Are mine senses deceiving me? What? Am I dreaming? Or does it seem that I am a priest in black robes riding a horse through a young wood? Heavens! routine. And finally we reach the marrow of the tale, the horror upon which everything hangs: a group of men and women in which the women dress like the men! and everybody dances a polka! I wouldn’t be surprised if there’s a reek of Victorian antisemitism in all of it. William Morris should have stuck with wallpaper.

“The Moon Pool” by A. Merritt (1918). Pulp adventure with all the racist baggage of its time. Merritt attempts to wring cosmic horror from the, uh, existence of Papua and Australia, here positioned as remnants of a vast, primeval, malevolent lost continent: “I am the ancient of days…. You and I ought not be in the same world; yet I am and I shall be!” It’s the Art Deco era equivalent of hyperventilating about a spring-fed pool, I suppose. White colonialists arrive to excavate Nan Madol and uncover its “lost continent” mysteries, but inevitably fuck around and find out in a strange temple activated by moonlight. I’d be willing to call it a prototype of a dungeon crawl, except that, despite all the buildup, we barely spend any narrative time inside the temple. An interesting but overlong antique, emblematic of its time and genre.

“The Sword of Welleran” by Lord Dunsany (1908). Standard Dunsany fare (or so it would seem to me, having read only this story and The King of Elfland’s Daughter). Stately heroic fantasy, all noble heroes and mighty forebears and bloody deeds, redeemed solely through its mellifluous descriptions: “Then night came up, huge and holy, out of the waste marshes to the eastwards and low lands and the sea…” 

“Operation Afreet” by Poul Anderson (1956). Past brushes with Poul Anderson’s short stories have left me unimpressed. This one had all the midcentury spank-the-dame masculinity you’d expect from a Poul Anderson military fantasy, plus a war against the perfidious Saracen Caliphate to supply the requisite quota of ’50s racism. But I will admit to being entertained by how Anderson mingled magic with the bureaucratic structure of the US armed forces. From the various corps insignia (crystal ball for Signal, Sleipnir for Cavalry) to small things like how cremation was made illegal to ensure ample cemeteries for moonlit herb-gathering, the delight is in the details. The mix of magic and mundane extends even into civilian life: top-notch cigarettes include smoke sprites that can make you a drink. This isn't saying much, but this is easily my favorite Anderson piece, and one of the best post-war fantasy shorts.

And that's it! Seven and a half years. Easily the longest it's ever taken me to finish a book. Perhaps I should have reread the first two-thirds for a fresher perspective, but eh. It's time to take this one out of drafts. 

2023 read #71: The Lost World by Michael Crichton.*

The Lost World by Michael Crichton*
422 pages
Published 1995
Read from June 21 to June 22
Rating: 1.5 out of 5

* Denotes a reread.

Oh boy. This book is not good.

Crichton was never a good author. Jurassic Park was competent enough as an airport thriller with sci-fi flavor, but that’s where his career peaked. The Lost World was a mercenary cash-grab, cranked out mostly for the movie rights. It was manufactured with such haste that I hypothesize you can find traces of an earlier draft, hewing closer to the original Lost World of Arthur Conan Doyle, lingering where Crichton never bothered to edit them out. (That's just my speculation, though, based on a mere handful of lines.)

Even the movie it led to barely used any characters or set-pieces from the novel. The concept of a second InGen island; the outline of a rescue mission; bringing the injured baby rex back to the trailer (and its aftermath); a fragment of the motorcycle-in-a-dino-herd scene — that’s about it. Julianne Moore’s Dr. Harding shares nothing more than a name with the body-building ethologist of the book; most of the film’s other characters are David Koepp’s wholesale inventions, possibly because most of Crichton’s are either assholes or cardboard cutouts brought along to round out the body count (or both). Hell, the movie’s T. rex at the waterfall scene gets recycled from the original Jurassic Park novel, not this one. The book is so bad that even Universal Studios scrapped everything else. (Though I must admit that The Lost World: Jurassic Park isn’t that good of a film, either.)

The unnecessary “educates you while you read” aspect of Jurassic Park feels especially half-baked here, with vague ruminations on extinction, chaos theory, self-organizing behaviors, and then-fashionable prions building up to new author-mouthpiece Thorne declaring that science is just bullshitting you about anything you can’t directly verify with your senses, and by the way, humans won’t destroy the natural world, so don’t worry about it! (Get it? He’s a “Thorne” in the side of scientific orthodoxy? Yeah, that’s the level of genius we’re dealing with here.)

Making his mouthpiece an engineer and startup capitalist (who was beloved by his old engineering students and also is like totally strong, you guys) instead of a mathematician shows the trajectory of Crichton’s evolution into the tool who would publish State of Fear just a few years later. The fact that Koepp and Spielberg filled Thorne's narrative role with a balding, mumbly man whose gun gets caught in a net before he gets double-crunched by rexes pleases me.

What did I like about this book? Obviously I have a ton of tweenage nostalgia surrounding it, which is reason enough to reread it, I think. This was the first book I wanted so desperately that I whined and whined until my abusive, narcissistic father (at a time when he and I were living in a car together) broke down and bought me the hardback before the soft-cover could even come out. I remember studying the lovely map as a tween, filling it with my own fanfic plans: here's where a school trip’s chartered airplane could crash-land, here's where a safe hideout could be, and of course my survivors would take advantage of the bungalows... Actually, I'm pretty sure that I came up with better JP sequels at 12 than this one turned out to be.

Anyway. The aforementioned motorcycle chase remains a favorite set-piece, one I wish the later JP movies had incorporated in full. Diego and Levine's initial exploration of Isla Sorna, brief as it is, inspired many of the time travel stories I would write in my teens. The details of the field lab and RV led to countless designs I sketched out for yet more stories. The general vibe of an island full of free-range dinosaurs (and the occasional dino washing up, dead or alive, on the mainland) was one all the movie sequels failed to capture.

But honestly, there isn't much else worth salvaging from this book. As Universal could have told you.

Tuesday, June 20, 2023

2023 read #70: The Magazine of Fantasy & Science Fiction, May/June 2023.

The Magazine of Fantasy & Science Fiction, May/June 2023 issue (144:5-6)
Edited by Sheree Renée Thomas
268 pages
Read from June 19 to June 20
Rating: 3.5 out of 5

Doing my best to read each new issue of F&SF while it’s technically still current, as mentioned in the March / April 2023 issue’s review.

“On the Mysterious Events at Rosetta” by Fawaz Al-Matrouk. Epistolary narratives are dicey. They can be evocative, centering you into a point of view or a setting better than almost any other literary device. They can also be difficult to get invested in. This tale of a murderous mummy curse during Napoleon’s invasion of Egypt features a little bit of both extremes: the opening is a stiff exchange between two Frenchmen, making for a slow start, but once we get to a letter from local witness Zakaria Hafez, the narrative becomes absorbing, a worthy modern update of classic mummy horror tropes and an excellent commentary on colonialism and its violence.

“The Dire Delusion” by Matthew Hughes. Hughes has been a fixture of F&SF tables of contents for two decades. I enjoyed his story “The Mule” in the March / April 2022 issue, but since then I’ve paged through my collection of back issues and found him in about one-third of my ’00s and ’10s issues, which feels… excessive. (Especially to my younger self — I was trying my hardest to get my stories into F&SF without success for much of that time!) Like “The Mule,” “Delusion” follows the serialized adventures of Cascor the discriminator; unlike “The Mule,” too much of the story here is fantasy private-eye boilerplate. I dig the conceit of reviving 1970s-style fantasy serials, but “Delusion” feels more antiquated and actually ’70s-ish than I would like. The prose, in particular, is mustier than it was the first time I encountered Cascor and his pals, closer to de Camp than to Vance. The city of Gephrire seems to have lost much of the Early Modern Europe / Hermes Trimegistus occultism vibe I liked so well; it feels more like any interchangeable tabletop setting here, complete with a grandiloquently named thieves’ guild, generic guards, and a forgettable grand duke. Also, this story is numbingly long, almost a full novella, sprawling out messily without much really happening, and no character development for any of the assorted “employees” Cascor has accumulated on his adventures. Maybe that’s a lot of grumbling about what is, in the end, merely an indifferent old-school magical misadventure. I didn't hate it. I'm disappointed in it, though.

“Amrit” by Kiran Kaur Saini. Sweetly sad near-future sci-fi that posits the unlikely fantasy that Medicare will still exist (and also that senior-care robots will be a thing, which is much more plausible). A solid, moving story, professionally structured and freighted with the small details of life.

“In Time, All Foxes Grieve Westward” by Lark Morgan Lu. One of the delights of reading stories in order is finding, and appreciating, the editor’s thematic flow for the issue. This story is brilliantly positioned to follow up “Amrit.” Josephine agrees to accompany her friend Todd to visit his aging mother in China, fully aware — thanks to her Sight — that Todd is a fox being and his mother is a more powerful fox spirit. (My partner R pointed out how perfect “Todd” is for an American name chosen by a fox spirit, à la The Fox and the Hound.) Filial duties and expectations clash with Todd’s frustration and disgust over his mother’s need to hoard bygone glories. “Time” is a brief but effective story, filigreed with exquisite description, including the most sinister depiction of a bowl of noodles I’ve ever read.

Two poems by Gretchen Tessmer, “By Starlight” and “Silverlocks,” smoothly transition us via foxes into fairy tales.

“A Conjure-Horse in San Ouvido” by Ferdison Cayetano. The lives of two magic-users — a freedom fighter and a soldier from an all-Black American unit — intersect amid the horrors of America’s invasion of the Philippines. This story is haunting, dreamlike, soaked in the atrocities of white supremacy and colonial warfare. Quite good.

“Highway Requiem” by T. R. Napper. Taking on the classic 1970s and ’80s trope of a blue-collar perspective on near-future tech dystopia. I was skeptical about this one at first. But what separates this from earlier small-c conservative working-man fic (such as Russell Griffin’s “The Road King” in the February 1986 issue of F&SF) is our current proximity to real-life tech dystopia. “Requiem” is Mad Max with driverless trucks, yes, but it’s rooted in what the rich are actually doing to us. Napper presents a world of green-washed capitalism, of the lower classes pitted against each other to benefit the billionaires, of regulations ostensibly designed for safety and sustainability but actually geared to maximize profit for the investor class. The law mandates that state of the art medical kits are available in every truck, but if you use one it’s deducted from your paycheck. A heartbreaking and all too fucking close-to-home story.

“The Lucky Star” by Dr. Bunny McFadden. The Lucky Star, somewhere in the sand dunes and methane lakes of Titan, is the sole gay bar in the outer solar system. That’s a promising setup, but sadly, this wisp of a tale doesn’t have the space to amount to much beyond some world-building exposition and back-and-forth banter (which isn’t fun without a foundation in well-established characters). It isn’t much, but it’s cute enough, I suppose.

“For the Benefit of Mr. Khite” by Zig Zag Claybourne. This story oozes late ’90s sci-fi energy. Intelligences (no mere AI!) have created a vast utopian biome called New Tangier. Bena Khite is a clone intermediary between the ineffable Intelligences and New Tangier’s human population, made to maintain the station and its inhabitants. Two hundred years of being a therapist for humans and a clearing-agent for Intelligences departing for the stars has left Khite restless and alienated. It summons a BDSM “synth,” a sensate machine, who observes “We have become a society of sadists” in order to satisfy the human need for curiosity. Khite wants to ascertain what, if anything, is worth saving of this ultimate society, and what, if anything, it wants for itself. It sounds so dated summarized like this, but still — it’s a solid story.

“Time and Art” by Barbara Krasnoff. A customer visits a miracle-worker to find time to create. A crisp modern fable, moving despite its brevity.

“I Paint the Light with My Mother’s Bones” by K. J. Aspey. A+ title, and a solid flash fic of isolation, loss, and the things that come from our heads to hurt us. This piece has strong indie litmag energy (complimentary).

“We Are Happy to Serve You” by Margaret Dunlap. An even briefer microfic on the inevitable outcome of automation in the service sector. Mildly amusing, too short for any other reaction.

“Titan Retreat” by Ria Rees. A sad, effective little tale of grief and escape.

“The Wren in the Hold” by Shaoni C. White is one of the best poems I’ve ever read in F&SF. A second White poem, “Without Any Sound but the Sea,” is also excellent.

“Knotty Girl” by Melissa A. Watkins. A magnificent retelling of “Rapunzel” in the age of global warming. Creative and vivid and creepy, written with an exquisite voice. Possibly the best story in this issue.

“Project Exodus” by J. A. Pak is a decent enough poem of space sci-fi and appreciating where we are.

“A Truth So Loyal and Vicious” by Fatima Taqvi. A dense and evocative fantasy of twin sisters and their divergent destinies. I saw the central twist coming a long way off, but that didn’t lessen this story’s charms in the least. Possibly my second favorite story of the bunch.

And that’s it!

Of all the Thomas-era F&SF issues I’ve read, this is the first one that didn’t completely blow me away. I didn’t dislike anything here — the overall quality and consistency is still far beyond that of any prior era of the magazine — but only the Watkins and Taqvi stories were all-time greats. Past Thomas-era entries spoiled me with several all-time bangers each issue, which makes this one feel just okay by comparison. Still, this issue was solid!

Monday, June 19, 2023

2023 read #69: The Rise and Reign of the Mammals by Steve Brusatte.

The Rise and Reign of the Mammals: A New History, From the Shadow of the Dinosaurs to Us by Steve Brusatte
Illustrations by Todd Marshall and Sarah Shelley
484 pages
Published 2022
Read from June 8 to June 19
Rating: 3 out of 5

I’ve been wary of this book ever since I read Brusatte’s disappointing The Rise and Fall of the Dinosaurs. One person I know found this book mediocre, and encouraged me to read Riley Black’s The Last Days of the Dinosaurs instead. However, there just haven’t been enough books about the evolutionary radiation of mammals — there’s no way I wouldn’t have picked up this book eventually.

Thankfully, the breezy, almost flippant “these aren’t your dad’s dinosaurs” style that made me roll my eyes at Brusatte’s Rise and Fall is somewhat more subdued here, making for blander but less patronizing prose. (That said, I need Brusatte to stop referring to DNA phylogenetic reconstructions as a “paternity test.”) Not even at its best, however, does this book compare to Elsa Panciroli’s excellent Beasts Before UsBrusatte maxes out at a serviceable level of pop science journalism, and presents a greatest-hits skim through synapsid history rather than any cohesive, ecosystem-centered overview. He consigns much space to pocket biographies of paleontologists while skimming over vast subject areas — whole eras of life — in just a few pages.

That’s the kind of pop science that sells, I suppose. The public loves to read about personalities; no science book, sadly, is complete without various eccentric scientists. But where Panciroli doesn’t hesitate to call out scientists of the past for their horrendous beliefs and practices — I’m looking at you, Robert Broom — Brusatte maintains the polite veneer of older pop science books. He simply doesn’t talk about it. He does that whole “We just don’t discuss politics with Grandpa” act, thereby sweeping the white supremacist foundations of Western science under the rug.

I was pleased to find that Mammals is a hefty volume; despite the modern taste for human interest anecdotes, there was still room for a modicum of actual science to enjoy in this pop science book. Much of said information is relegated to the endnotes, of course, but it’s nice to have nonetheless. (Brusatte even uses the endnotes to acknowledge a little bit of Robert Broom’s shittiness.) If only more of it had filtered into the text!

Friday, June 16, 2023

2023 read #68: Moomin: The Complete Tove Jansson Comic Strip Volume Two by Tove Jansson.

Moomin: The Complete Tove Jansson Comic Strip Volume Two by Tove Jansson
84 pages
Collection published 2007; original comic strips published 1955 and 1956
Read June 16
Rating: 4 out of 5

As a collection of newspaper comic strips, nothing separates this book from Volume One other than the publisher’s page quota. Go ahead and read that earlier review (if you like) for my general thoughts about the Moomin comic strip.

Like Volume One, this volume anthologizes four story arcs from the Moomin comic:

“Moomin’s Winter Follies,” which sees the Moomin family reject hibernation, only for winter sports enthusiast Mr. Brisk to take over their valley for the Moomin Valley Winter Games;

“Moomin Mamma’s Maid,” in which the family runs afoul of new neighbor Mrs. Fillyjonk’s upper class expectations of housekeeping, seriousness, and propriety, until Moominmamma gives in and hires a maid;

“Moomin Builds a House,” in which the Mymble's mother and seventeen new siblings create chaos in the Moomin house, and Moomintroll and Snorkmaiden build a new house together;

and “Moomin Begins a New Life,” which sees everyone in Moomin Valley fall under the sway of a prophet, who tells everyone to do what they want and embrace total freedom, which inevitably leads to bootlegging and brigandage.

My favorite arc might be “Maid” — who doesn’t love to see classist norms dismantled by adorable trolls? — but “New Life” also has some winsome social commentary, rejecting both freedom without responsibility and puritanical asceticism. “Follies,” while enjoyable, feels a bit more 1950s than the other arcs, with both Snorkmaiden and the Mymble simpering after the “manly” Mr. Brisk.

Thursday, June 15, 2023

2023 read #67: The Devourers by Indra Das.

The Devourers by Indra Das
307 pages
Published 2015
Read from June 14 to June 15
Rating: 4.5 out of 5

I read about two-thirds of this book on a plane to Las Vegas back in February 2020. Even then I felt uneasy around so many people, pooling and flowing their way around a claustrophobic world, sharing suspect exhalations. I didn’t know then that it would be the last time I would fly (whether forever or merely for some years, I don’t know even now). I didn’t know yet that the world I conceptualized around me would end. The book was a spell, a disorienting swirl of senses and violence and depths of time, read in the dark, suspended in clouds. When I got home, I wouldn’t finish it. Soon everything around me would halt, break apart.

Perhaps it’s easy to understand my reluctance to return to The Devourers. Indrapramit Das’ prose is sharpened to the edge of delirium, beguiling and sinister, fermenting with all the violence and rot of history, pulling you aside from the world into a parallel space of blood-spiced myths and hot breath on the back of your neck. It is a horrifying revelry, revolting, ravenous, seductive, predatory. But even now the book feels charged with the atmosphere of that first liminal unease, that last layover before the end of the world. I've wanted to come back, to start over, to finish it at last. But the book itself seems to have become a mythical artifact for me, weighted with associations. It hasn't been easy to make myself pick it up again.

I’m glad I finally read The Devourers in full. It most reminds me of Jordy Rosenberg’s exquisite Confessions of the Fox. The two books are far apart in tone and subject, but both are queer-centered deconstructions of historical atrocities, both told through the framing device of a scholar transcribing and annotating historical documents that reveal a hidden side to the world. Clearly this is a micro-genre that deeply appeals to my particular tastes. And I love a book or story where the title changes meaning by the end. That said, however—

[Content warning: discussion of fictional SA.]

I can’t review this book without mentioning my discomfort with sexual assault and forced pregnancy being major plot points. Even in the context of a novel thematically centered on the horrors of predatory masculinity, colonialism, and generational trauma, it feels questionable. Das handles these themes far better than, say, George R. R. Martin ever did, but inevitably there are some lines that don’t sit right with me (such as when we’re introduced to Cyrah’s perspective: she’s writing to her son and muses “I should have left… but then I wouldn’t be writing this for you, and should I regret that? I don’t know”). That particular line, and its sentiments, becomes much more complex and recontextualized by the end of the book, but it’s hard to shake the feeling that Cyrah is pressured to go on with the pregnancy for purely narrative purposes.