On the Road by Jack Kerouac
307 pages
Published 1957
Read from January 29 to January 31
Rating: ★★★ out of 5
To understand my impressions of Jack Kerouac, you have to start with my brother.
Randy,
so far as I can remember, never explicitly mentioned Kerouac, or
anything Beat-related, but from the very beginning he romanticized
chump-change criminality. At 11 he entertained bizarre notions of
running a grade-school "co-op," a proto-mafia where tots could pool
their money and somehow accomplish great things under the noses of the
adult community, as if reality were some kind of direct-to-video sequel
to The Sandlot. He shoplifted GI Joes at age 12, giving me (and
possibly believing) the excuse that we two were "owed" more toys than
our father would buy us. He would steal our grandmother's tip money and
buy us boxes of Little Debbies whenever the grownups were gone. By 13 he
was shoplifting cassette tapes, Nirvana and Ugly Kid Joe and Pearl Jam;
he had me transcribe the lyrics with him, because he was certain that
the act of writing them down ourselves somehow made them original
productions, which we would record and thereby become international
superstars. Also by 13, he argued and bullied me (however much I cried,
because I was only 9) into acceding to his plans to kill our father.
Brotherhood
is a strange symbiosis -- we fought viciously, and he pulled a knife on
me more than once; I baited him constantly; yet we never, ever ratted
on each other to our father, and in some corner of my brain I worshiped
him. I imitated his shoplifting predilections with much less success.
(Much later, I shoplifted just to have food in my stomach, but that's
another story, way beyond the scope of this review.) I began writing
because of him, too, putting our GI Joe characters into stock sci-fi
scenarios (aliens, time travel, a violent potty-humor sequel to Jurassic Park).
But there were places I wouldn't follow him. From age 14 on he got
wrapped up in narco-romantic fantasies, fueled by daily clandestine
trips up the street to our maternal family, who kept him supplied with
cigarettes and alcohol. No matter how much he enticed me, no matter how
much he bullied me, I never went up the street with him, never met our
sisters, never met our mother, never met our uncles. And I never got
into his affectations of dissipated Bohemianism.
Randy ran away
once and for all when he was 16 and I was 12. I got stuck in delayed
adolescence, a fugue of years blurring one into the next, living on the
road with my father, sleeping in rest stops and national forests,
escaping my father's paranoid delusions by writing the same derivative
science fiction stories. I didn't see Randy again until I was 16. My
grandmother and I were waiting in a shopfront doorway for a bus, huddled
from the cold, when this short skinny blond dude stalked by, sucking a
cigarette. I was taller than him now and his hairline was prematurely
receding; we barely recognized each other. But we struck up a brief
reacquaintance. During the month or so that we stayed in touch, I typed
up a chapter from one of my novels for him to read, craving his approval
just like old times. I forget exactly what he said; it was something
like "I thought you'd have developed more than this." And then Randy
blew up at our father and that was that.
We made a third and
final attempt to be brothers shortly after I got out of the army. A few
years of harder drugs, absentee fatherhood, periodic homelessness, and
flailing attempts at alternative rock stardom contributed to my
brother's... special... writing style. Even in his personal emails he
affected this painfully artsy try-hard prose, full of hard drink and
hard living, quoting dead philosophers and dangling out off-rhythm
digressions. In style he was closer to the hobo-chic ramblings of
Godspeed You! Black Emperor liner notes, though in content he made
himself out to be some latter-day rust-belt Ginsberg. Our reemergent
relationship, never sturdy, eroded after I refused to let him come to
New York and crash indefinitely on our couch. His subsequent schizotypal
diagnosis confirmed my prejudices.
So when I think of Beat
writers, that's the image in my head: The oh-so-artistic try-hard
indulging in dissipation and narco-romantic cynicism, exactly conforming
in his rush to be nonconformist -- the very art and philosophy of
protracted adolescence. But perhaps that isn't entirely fair. For one
thing, I based that impression on latter-day basement hipsters like my
brother. I have never read anything by Kerouac or Ginsberg or Burroughs.
I've never been drawn to that sort of thing, if you couldn't tell by my
snide talk of "narco-romanticism." Getting wasted and wasting away
isn't my game, pops. Yet I've always felt I should probably give the
Beat dudes a chance, if only so I know what I'm talking about when I
scoff at their modern followers.
(Incidentally, do kids still
read Kerouac? At this point, I feel Beat aesthetics and sensibilities
are so thoroughly integrated into the substance of teenage
intellectualism that there's a good chance today's kids don't feel the
need to imbibe from their philosophical prototypes directly. Kids with a
taste for philosophy and self-importance are just expected to indulge
in drugs and petty anti-establishment manifestos while angsting over
"meaning." Or at least that's my expectation. I haven't interacted with
many young would-be intellectuals since I was that age myself. I'm a
child of the late 20th century, raised in a time of inward-looking
optimism; I have no idea what kids of the early 21st century think or
expect.)
On the Road was well-written and occasionally
appealing -- the parts actually set on the road in the pre-interstate
West were big favorites. The inevitable and oft-repeated excursions
through hard drinking and burned out hedonism and philosophy, though,
were boring. Reading about someone's bender is, to me, exactly as
entertaining (and illuminating) as an account of someone's night on the
sofa watching NBC. I just can't seem to give a damn.
Lines like
"[I wished] I could exchange worlds with the happy, true-hearted,
ecstatic Negroes of America" do Kerouac no favors in my eyes, unless
there's a "Holden Caulfield is the biggest phony of all" angle I didn't
pick up on. What intrigued me the most was the scarcely mentioned
subtext of World War II, the psychological stain of it between the
words, resignation under the terrible light of the Bomb. I know exactly
nothing about Kerouac's views on how his generation got so damn beat in
the first place, or his own wartime experiences (the about the author
page said he was a merchant marine), but it's certainly something my
late 20th century mind picked up on. It added a more sympathetic
dimension to all the drugged-out soul-searching and sentimentalism.
If you're done with young men getting strung out and indulging adolescent melancholia, On the Road
is about half of a good book. I can safely assume that I have never gotten,
and will never get, the appeal of the other half, even if it would've
been obvious to someone like my brother from day one.
No comments:
Post a Comment