The Man in the High Castle by Philip K. Dick
229 pages
Published 1962
Read from November 28 to November 30
Rating: ★★★★ out of 5
For
some reason I'm struggling to communicate my thoughts in a concise
manner today. The words squirt away whenever I try to squeeze them into
shape. Hopefully it's just a temporary thing; I'm always paranoid I'm
just gonna lose my perspicuity one day (such as it is). Bear with me.
It's
no surprise that reading all these books this year has cultivated my
tastes. I'm no longer so readily impressed by middling works in any
genre; "pretty good" fades into a kind of steadily rising background
radiation, requiring ever higher standards to blip up above the
baseline. I have little patience now for anything just going through the
motions, unless it appeals to some quirk or weakness of mine.
Contrarily,
gaining a better historical grounding in my favored genres -- fantasy
especially, but also science fiction -- contributed substantially to my
appreciation for this book. I don't think I've ever known how to
approach Dick. Years ago, I read Martian Time-Slip and almost
immediately forgot it; I don't have any recollection of reading it, but
there it is on one of my year-end book lists. Clearly it didn't leave
much of an impression on me back then. Early this year I read Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? and Ubik;
I liked them a great deal, but underneath my appreciation I kind of
felt that I was missing something, some ingredient to Dick's booming
more-than-cult popularity. Now that I've finally gotten around to
another of his books, with a whole heap of newfound worldliness to aid
me, I wonder if I would appreciate Ubik and Electric Sheep more now, if somehow I could read them for the first time.
Something
about this book clicked with me. It was as if I could sense the
Theodore Sturgeons and Cordwainer Smiths and Jack Vances working around
Dick, the vibe of his time and place tuning each page. Perhaps it helps
that Dick hadn't yet gone over entirely to his New Wave obsessions, God
and drugs and altered-state messiahs, true and false realities;
prototypes of those themes are prominent, but High Castle rises
above them all to be its own thing, tell its own kind of story. Usually
I'm not keen on alternative histories -- a brief Turtledove phase in my
teens inoculated me against the theme -- but in Dick's hands it feels
fresh and disturbing, shivering with tension and discomfort. The
characters seemed several steps above Dick's usual casts, a diverse lot
that for the most part felt real -- in the case of the Nazi-sympathizing
antiques dealer, unnervingly so. (The exception, of course, is the
token woman character, but I don't think anyone knew how to
effectively write women at the time; nonetheless, Juliana still felt
more fully realized than any other Dick woman I've read.)
Is it heresy to say I maaaaaay have liked this just a bit better than Electric Sheep?
My main objection to The Man in the High Castle
is, well, the Man in the High Castle. The idea of everyone -- Nazi,
occupying Japanese, American civilian -- obsessing over Abendsen's
alternate history novel felt forced, a premature bit of metafiction.
Even though that's kind of the whole point of this book, I guess.
Was not a fan of the end. Everything else, though, pretty great.
ReplyDeleteThe "what is the nature of reality?" stuff seems obligatory for the author and the decade, but felt underdeveloped and shoehorned in.
Delete